Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 2Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
History
Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 2
Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
Architecture, Gothic; Architecture, Medieval
This regret, however, is diminished by the abundant evidence we possess
that the dome, though absent from English buildings, was by no means
held to be alien from the contemporary architecture of neighbouring
countries, inasmuch as we possess it in highly developed forms over a
large part of France, in Germany, and in Italy, erected at the same
periods with many of our great Mediæval edifices.
If, then, I am departing from the line I had been taking in tracing out
the history of old English architecture, I am not only supplying a
hiatus in that history, but I trust that I may be able to offer
suggestions for a more practical object--the supplying of that hiatus in
our revived and redeveloped Neo-mediæval style.
In a former lecture, after defining a vault as the covering of a
rectilinear space produced by the motion of an arch parallel to itself,
I defined a dome as the covering of a circular space produced by the
revolution of an arch round its central vertical axis. It follows that,
if the arch so revolving is semicircular, the resulting dome is a
hemisphere.
The revolving arch may, however, be of any form which an arch can
assume. It may be elliptical, parabolic, hyperbolic, cycloidal; or it
may be a pointed, a horse-shoe, or an ogee arch. Any one of these, or
other forms of arch revolving on its centre, will generate a dome of
its own sectional form. The _plan_, too, in spite of my definition, need
not be a circle; it may be an ellipse, or of other forms.
I will not at this stage admit of square-planned, polygonal, or other
straight-sided domes, because it may be doubted whether they are genuine
domes at all, or whether they are not figures resulting from the
intersection of a certain number of ordinary vaults. Anyhow, these are
not generated by the revolution of an arch, so that if they are domes,
my definition is at fault.
Simple, however, as is the hemispherical dome, it does not appear to
have been historically the primeval type; for, strange to say, the
earliest known domes assume, in section, the form of a lofty pointed
arch. I refer specially to that of the supposed tomb of Agamemnon at
Mycenæ, and also to some portrayed on the Assyrian sculptures.
These would hardly come within the range of this lecture, were it not so
curious a fact that the earliest form of the dome foreshadows the very
use to which I would now especially desire to accommodate it.
It is easy to perceive why the pointed arch was adopted in these
primeval domes. They were not built with radiating joints, but in
overhanging courses; and it will readily be seen on comparing their
sections, that for this mode of construction the pointed arch is much
more favourable than the circular; while, as soon as ever the radiating
system was adopted, the semicircle at once became the simplest and most
obvious section.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account