Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 2Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
History
Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 2
Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
Architecture, Gothic; Architecture, Medieval
On the other hand, the change was attended with the loss of geometrical
accuracy. Hitherto we have dealt with none but perfectly correct
geometrical figures; but the moment the pointed arch is introduced, the
pendentives lose this exactitude, and have to be adapted by what is
vulgarly called “rule of thumb” to conditions not precisely suited to
their forms. A pendentive between pointed arches has, it is true, a
geometrical form of its own, but this is so awkward in its sections that
it has only to be seen to be rejected; for, instead of its central
section being a regular arched curve, suited to a domical surface, it is
a curve of _double flexure_, its lower part concave (as seen from
within), and its upper part convex--in short, _an ogee_. This being
inadmissible, the curve has to be accommodated the best way we can, so
as to avoid this weak and unpleasing form. We have, in fact, to
determine, according to the best of our judgment, what shall be the
vertical section of the pendentive, and adopt such horizontal curves for
the courses of masonry as will make it reach the extrados of the
supporting arches in the easiest manner we are able. This was really
done so successfully by the French architects, whose works I shall
shortly have to describe, that, for myself, I must say I never found out
the difficulty from seeing them, and was unaware of it till I worked out
the profiles geometrically.
After all, however, it is only parallel to what we have to do in filling
in the spaces between the ribs of Gothic vaulting.
The pointed arch, though beautiful and practically excellent, is no
regular geometrical figure, but the union of portions of two; its use,
consequently, induces irregularities which would be at once avoided by
the substitution of an ellipse. But then our geometrical accuracy would
be purchased by the sacrifice of beauty.
All the sections of a sphere being circles, the supporting arches of a
true pendentive hemispherical dome are semicircular arches, and in the
same manner those of an elliptical spheroidal dome would be
semi-ellipses; but there is no regular solid figure, more than one of
whose sections are pointed arches, so it is natural that when they are
used some part should have to be accommodated to fit them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account