Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 2Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
History
Lectures on the rise and development of medieval architecture; vol. 2
Scott, George Gilbert, Sir
Architecture, Gothic; Architecture, Medieval
The Cathedral at Florence had been carried out during the fourteenth
century--_all but its cupola_--from the design of Arnolpho and his
successors. A dome equal in space to that now existing was prepared for,
but various causes delayed for a century its actual erection, so that,
when it was at length undertaken, the prevailing style had changed. It
is probable that Arnolpho intended to have sprung his dome at a far
lower level, and to have made it like that of the adjoining baptistery;
perhaps not exhibiting externally its domical form. Brunelleschi raised
the drum to a considerable height, exhibited his dome as a vast external
feature, and crowned it with a culminating lantern, thus giving us at
once the leading features--and that on a scale never since exceeded--of
what I have called the _modern_ type of dome. Had he made its details
more accurately to harmonise with those of Arnolpho’s structure, his
work would have been perfect. Not only is his dome erected on Gothic
walls and arches, but its own section is a pointed arch, so that in all
but its decorative features--and in these in some degree--it is
essentially a Gothic dome. It is not, however, pendentive, nor is it
circular in plan; and, though opening by arches into the arms of the
cross, it is after all merely the covering of an octagonal chamber, so
that its claims rest more on its size, its height, and its external
beauty, than any novelty of development.
Of its successors the name is legion. It would be useless for me to
attempt to enumerate even the most successful of them. I will therefore
content myself with a brief description of the two most typical--those
of St. Peter’s, at Rome, and of our own St. Paul’s.
I am not aware of any dome of great scale erected in the interval
between Brunelleschi’s dome at Florence and that of Michael Angelo at
Rome. The latter, however, was the crowning result of the efforts of
successive architects, especially of Bramante and Sangallo. In one sense
it does, and the other it does not, show evidence of this lengthened
period of development.
[Illustration: Fig. 452.--Section looking North, St. Peter’s, Rome.
(_From Fergusson_).]
Its unity of design would bespeak it as the work of one master-mind,
while its perfection may mark it as the result of oft-repeated trials.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account