[19] Cap. Car. Mag. ann. 779, sec. 10; Lea, “Superstition and Force,” (3 ed.) 348. [20] Capit. iv ann. 803, secs. iii, vi; in L. Longobard, Lib. ii, Tit. xxviii, sec. 3; Tit. iv, sec. 25; Capit. Car. Mag. I., ann. 809, sec. 20. [21] Capit. Car. Mag. ann. 794, sec. 7; Lea, “Superstition and Force,” p. 338. [22] Concil. Aquisgran. cap. xvii. [23] L. Longobard, Lib. II., Tit. lv, sec. 32; Lea, “Superstition and Force,” p. 298. [24] Herbert’s Antiquities (1804), p. 146. [25] De Moribus Germanorum, cap. X. [26] Herbert’s Antiquities, p. 147. [27] _Ante idem._; I. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 39; Dr. Liebermann’s Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Akademie, 1896, XXXV., p. 829. [28] Leg. Athelstan, 23; I. Reeve’s History English Law, p. 201; Analecta Anglo-Brit. lib. ii, cap. 8, inter Leges Athelstan, cap xxx. [29] Dr. Liebermann’s Sitzungsberichte der Berliner Akadamie, XXXV., 829; I. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 39, note. [30] Herbert’s Antiquities (1804), pp. 147, 148. [31] I. Reeve’s History English Law, pp. 201, 202; Leges Athelstan, 23. [32] Mirror of Justice, c. 7, s. 24. [33] I. Reeve’s History English Law, p. 203. [34] Finlason’s note to I. Reeve’s History English Law, p. 201. Pollock, in his “Anglo-Saxon Law,” says “A man of good repute could usually clear himself by oath, but circumstances of grave suspicion or previous bad character, would drive the defendant to stand his trial by ordeal.” I. Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, p. 93. [35] Lamb, de priscis Angl. Leg. cap. 39. [36] Herbert’s Antiquities (1804), p. 156. [37] _Ante idem._ [38] Leges, Aesthelstan, iv, sec. 6; Aetheldred, iii, sec. 7; Cnut, Secular. sec. 58; Lea, “Superstition and Force” (3 ed.), 253. [39] Legg. Edwardi, cap. iii; Lea, “Superstition and Force” (3 ed.) 340. [40] Legg. Aethelredi, cap. i, sec. I; Cnuti Saecul. cap. xxii; Henrici, I., cap lxv, sec. 3; Lea, _supra_. [41] Schmid, Gesetze, p. 357; Stubbs, Select Charters; I. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 450. [42] _Ante idem._ [43] LL. Inae, c. 77; _Traites sur les coutumes Anglo-Normand_. Tom. I., p. 577; Hale’s History Common Law, p. 152. [44] Thayer “Older Modes of Trial,” V. Harvard Law Review, 64; II. Essays in Anglo-American Legal History, p. 394. [45] Leges Henri, 31, sec. 5; Foedera, i, 154; II. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 650. [46] Palgrave, Commonwealth, p. 207; II. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 650. [47] Glanville (Beame’s tr.), p. 283. [48] I. Reeve’s History English Law, pp. 456, 457; Mirror of Justice, cap. III., sec. 23; Lea, “Superstition and Force,” (3 ed.) 256. “The water ordeals, both hot and cold, were stigmatized as plebian, from an early period, as the red-hot iron and the duel were patrician.” Lea, 283. [49] I. Reeve’s History English Law, p. 456; I. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 152. [50] _Ante idem._ [51] I. Reeve’s History English Law, p. 456.