Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customsWhite, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
History
Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customs
White, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
Criminal law -- History; Law -- History; Law, Ancient; Punishment -- History
But in the continuance of the drama of human life, this prided
institution of our twentieth century, may seem as crude and barbaric to
the spectators viewing the show from the vantage of subsequent centuries,
as this grotesque comedy of errors, known as the _wager of law_ now
appears to us, when we look back upon the judicial farce enacted by our
ancestors, in the uncertain procedure of Law Wager. They seemed to wander
“in and out, above, about, below,” yet ever missing the door which led
to the correct ideal. They labored under new and strange conditions,
however, and perplexed as they were with the many problems of the Human
and Divine and intermingling the processes and procedures of the lay and
ecclesiastical courts, as they did, it is perhaps to their credit that
the old tangles of the law were solved as creditably as they were.
However this may be, in the _Wager of Law_ we have but another “story
from of old,” in connection with the perpetual struggle for right, which
has followed man’s course down through the successive generations of the
past.
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Bouvier’s Law Dictionary.
[2] 3 Bl. Comm. 341; Coke, Litt. 295.
[3] Exodus, XXII., 10.
[4] John’s “Babylonian Laws,” etc.
[5] 3 Bl. Comm. 341; Spellman, L. b. 28, c. 13; Stiernh., _de jure
Sueon_, 1. l. c. 9.
The clergy were no doubt responsible for the establishment of the
practice in England, as it resembles the canonical purgation of the
clergy, as well as the _sacramentum decisionis_, of the civil law. (3 Bl.
Comm. 342.)
[6] 3 Bl. Comm. 343; Cap. & Wilk. LL Anglo-Saxons.
[7] Coke, Litt. 295; 3 Bl. Comm. 343.
As the effect of the compurgators oath was the same as a verdict, this
is the reason assigned by Coke and Blackstone, why eleven compurgators
were required, under the old codes. 3 Bl. Comm. 343; Coke, Litt. 295;
Glanville, Lib. l, c, 9x.
[8] I. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 140.
[9] II. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, 600.
[10] Lea, “Superstition and Force,” (3 ed.) 35.
[11] II. Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, 600.
It was also a custom for a long time, for the defendant to select his
compurgators from the nominees of the injured person, and a case is
recorded, as late as 1277, in Leicester, where this was required, but
it was soon abolished as too onerous a task for an accused person. II.
Pollock and Maitland’s History English Law, p. 636, note.
[12] Laws Wihtraed, cap. 16, 21; Lea, “Superstition and Force,” (3 ed.)
23.
[13] III. Reeve’s History English Law, 294.
[14] Glanville, Book I., chap. IX.
[15] Coke, Litt. 168b.
[16] Coke, Litt. 295a; 2 Inst., 44.
[17] _Les Termes de la Ley, ad voc. ley._
[18] Bracton, 410a.
[19] Bracton, 366a; 410a.
[20] _Ante idem._
[21] Bracton, fol. 366; Note Book, pl. 7, 1436.
[22] Note Book, pl. 731, 742.
[23] Note Book, pl. 396, 1097.
[24] Bracton, fol. 156; Note Book, pl. 477, 741.
[25] Somersetshire Pleas, pl. 572.
[26] Bracton, fol. 315b; Note Book, pl. 580.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account