Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customsWhite, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
History
Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customs
White, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
Criminal law -- History; Law -- History; Law, Ancient; Punishment -- History
Gervaise Caussois—peace to his ashes—was brought before this august
tribunal for stealing some iron tools and to induce him to confess he was
tortured and promptly confessed. Thinking he might be guilty of other
offenses, he was tortured again and then under the strain of the pain he
suffered, he confessed to other petty crimes, when he was again tortured
by use of the _tresteau_, when he again confessed to another petty
misdemeanor when the judges mercifully caused him to be hanged, without
more ado, thus ending his misery.[64]
In 1390 poor Fleurant de Saint-Leu, was arraigned before this heartless
tribunal for the awful crime of stealing a silver buckle. He denied the
crime and was twice tortured, with increasing severity, when he finally
confessed, but protested that it was his first offense. The merciful
judges, out of the goodness of their hearts, decided this offense, being
the first, did not merit death, so on the same day he was tortured
thrice, to ascertain if he was not guilty of some other offense for
which he could be killed; this failing to bring the desired result, he
was again twice tortured, when he admitted that three years before he had
unwittingly married a prostitute, when he was afterwards hanged, as this
was found to be a sufficient offense, together with the stealing of the
buckle, to justify the death penalty.[65]
Poor Marguerite de la Penele, accused of stealing a ring, was tortured
until she confessed and as she could not satisfy the human hyenas who
were trying her, for some money found upon her person, she was again
severely tortured and although no further confession was extracted from
her she was buried alive.[66]
The question _ordinaire_ and _extra-ordinaire_, as put to the wretches
brought before this criminal court at Paris, was to be answered by the
accused while fastened to the wall, on a trestle or sliding table, with
his wrists fastened in two rings; his mouth was forced open with a horn
and water was poured down his throat, until he answered the question
whether or not he was guilty of the offense charged against him.[67]
Another form of torture used in the _Chatelet_ at Paris, was what was
called the “boots,” being solid boards, pierced with holes, encasing
the legs, up to the knees. Ropes were inserted through the holes and
drawn so tight, by means by pegs of wood, driven into the holes, as to
almost break the bones and twist the flesh off the legs, if the accused
persisted in refusing to confess the crime charged against him.[68] This
horrible and barbarous practice was not completely abolished in France,
until the year 1788, when the monarchy repealed the law authorizing such
cruelty, for the alleged reason that under such stress of punishment men
would confess to anything.[69]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account