Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customsWhite, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
History
Legal antiquities : $b A collection of essays upon ancient laws and customs
White, Edward J. (Edward Joseph)
Criminal law -- History; Law -- History; Law, Ancient; Punishment -- History
Glanville speaks of the probate of wills, as if that mode of
authenticating these documents had been long in use, when he wrote,
but just when this custom was crystalized into law, in England, it is
difficult to determine.[25] In the reign of Henry III. the ecclesiastical
courts assumed jurisdiction in the probate of wills and soon thereafter
attempted quite generally to enforce the execution of them in payment
of legacies, for since the reign of Henry I., the estate of one dying
intestate, was subject to division by those succeeding thereto, _pro
anima ejus_.[26] The church seemed best suited to make this division,
for the benefit of the intestate’s soul and this finally gave rise to
the grant of letters by the ordinary to the next of kin, from which
the custom of issuing letters of administration no doubt arose, in
after-times.[27]
The church continued to execute the powers concerning wills and the
estates of decedents—and this is no doubt the reason why Glanville and
Bracton do not treat at length of wills, further than to mention the
custom, in certain boroughs, of devising land by will[28]—until the
people complained of oppression by the bishops and ordinaries in the
exaction of fines for probating wills, when the statute of 31 Edward
III., was enacted, giving the justices of the king’s court jurisdiction
to enquire into such exactions and oppressions, either at the instance
of the king, or that of the injured person.[29]
Having thus assumed the jurisdiction over the estates of deceased
persons, by this statute, which was the entering wedge to oust the
jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical courts, in the gradual processes of
time, the courts learned in the law, instead of those concerned only
about spiritual affairs, assumed larger control and jurisdiction over the
estates of decedents. While the church retained control over the estates
of decedents, the bishop exercised practically the same authority that
the probate judge exercises under our law, in the granting of letters
of administration, the listing and inventorying of the property and
the accounting by the trustee to the ordinary, granting the letters of
administration.[30]
From the delegation of the trust to some personal friend to carry out
the will of the decedent, the clergy, in compelling fidelity in the
performance of the trust, no doubt developed that particular kind of a
trustee known to our law of today as an executor or administrator and
with the appearance of this legal personality, the devise may be said to
first legally assume the dignity analogous to our present testamentary
devise.[31]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account