Leisure hours among the gemsHamlin, Augustus C. (Augustus Choate)
Science
Leisure hours among the gems
Hamlin, Augustus C. (Augustus Choate)
Gems; Precious stones
One of the Fugger family, in 1555, made a careful drawing of the jewel,
with a written description of it, and these were afterwards published
by Lambeccius in his Bibliotheca Cæsarea; so there can be no doubt
about the appearance of the original diamond of Charles the Bold in its
early days.
When the Duke led his band of freebooters into Switzerland on his
long-projected foray, he took most of his gems along with him, not
dreaming of disaster, and probably loving to view his treasures even
amid the hardships of a campaign. Rough soldiers are sometimes as
fond of the beautiful in art and nature as more delicate and refined
organizations; and Charles the Bold and Suvaroff are not the only
examples.
The terrific onslaught of the Swiss at Grandson crushed the Burgundian
ranks so quickly that Charles had only time to escape with his sword,
leaving all his cherished treasures in the hands of the dauntless
mountaineers.
In the sack of the camp which speedily followed the rout, a soldier
found the golden box in which the famous pendant was kept, but
regarding the jewel as a gaudy and worthless bauble, he tossed it away
under a wagon, and retained the box only. Shortly afterwards he began
to suspect that the contents of so beautiful a box must have some
relative value, and returning to the place he recovered the despised
jewel. He did not long retain his treasure, but sold it to a priest
for one florin. The priest also did not appear to have a high regard
for his purchase, for he disposed of it to the magistrates of his own
canton for three francs.
When it became known that the Bernese Government had possession of
the Duke’s famous jewels, Jacob Fugger, one of the members of the
celebrated Nuremberg family, went to Bern and negotiated for their
purchase. The famous pendant, together with the Duke’s cap, which was
made of silk covered with pearls and Balais rubies, and a plume case
set with diamonds, pearls, and Balais rubies, were bought for the sum
of 47,000 francs. Fugger retained the pendant in his possession at
Nuremberg for many years, indulging in the hope, it has been said, that
the Duke’s great-grandson, the Emperor Charles V., would purchase it
as a family relic. When the celebrated capitalist died the ornament was
still in his possession; but his great-nephew, who inherited the jewel,
sold it to Henry VIII. of England. After the death of this monarch,
his daughter presented the diamond to her bridegroom; and thus, by a
remarkable coincidence, and after an absence of seventy-six years, the
royal gem is again restored to the rightful heir of its original owner.
So far the history of Sancy No. 1 can be clearly traced.
Now for the stories relating to the Sancy diamond No. 2. But, before
proceeding further in this interesting and misty search, we will
explain the history of the nobleman who has inseparably connected his
name with so many gems.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account