Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to HumboldtHumboldt, Alexander von
History
Letters of Alexander von Humboldt to Varnhagen von Ense.: From 1827 to 1858. With extracts from Varnhagen's diaries, and letters of Varnhagen and others to Humboldt
Humboldt, Alexander von
Humboldt, Alexander von, 1769-1859 -- Correspondence
The first volume has a beautiful passage on Therese, and says much in
praise of the King of Bavaria. In the second volume a description of
Rahel will please you. Of Bettina she speaks less approvingly, as Madame
von Buelow told me. I shall try to modify it in this respect. I think
the first volume will be ready for delivery next Tuesday, and the second
will soon follow. I shall bring it myself, together with notes and
facsimiles, all locked in a tin box, which must be shortened. Then you
will be in possession of the whole treasure, and I “salvavi animam
meam.” The thing will create much provoking but salutary scandal, and
will elicit much conflicting criticism.
With sincerest friendship, yours,
A. V. HT.
Please don’t let the book be printed at Berlin, and have it (if
possible) advertised before it is in the trade. My letters to Carriere
will have duly reached you, I hope?
On the 30th March, 1847, Varnhagen wrote in his diary:—“Just when I
returned home, Humboldt came in and brought a pack of manuscripts—the
letters of his brother to Mrs. Diede. Humboldt regards affairs here as
desperate, as I do myself. He consoles himself with the belief that the
constitution presented, though good for nothing at first, may result
beneficially. He expects violence of every description—atrocities
committed by the police, popular rage, and military strokes. The King,
however, Humboldt thinks, has no misgivings. He is in high spirits,
having prepared his opening speech, and no longer minds the 11th of
April, and its consequences. He never yet talked with Humboldt on
constitutional affairs. As to Michelet, Eichhorn has instigated the King
very much; but after all they will not find a reason to dismiss him,
although the King would like very much to do it, and the Minister urges
him on to it.”
On the 31st March Varnhagen adds: “Humboldt told me but yesterday that
the King was firmly believing the restoration of Don Miguel, Don Carlos,
the overthrow of the July dynasty, and that he would yet go to Paris, to
salute the legitimate king. Also, that he, Humboldt, was deemed a
Jacobin, who carried the tri-colored standard in his breeches pocket. As
for myself, I was considered a royalist, but the King had prejudices
against me. They think it strange that my old friend Canitz should not
have enlightened the King on my behalf; that they did not ask my advice,
and avail themselves of my services in the present situation.
Wittgenstein also has talked in this manner with Humboldt. They forget
only one thing: that I neither can nor will—the one and the other, with
equal determination.”
The nobility is terribly excited; the change is remarkable; self-esteem
is mightily roused. The devil himself could not have invented more
efficacious ways of provoking the hostility of this whole class than
this monstrous “Herrenstand.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account