Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1FitzGerald, Edward
General
Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 1
FitzGerald, Edward
Authors, English -- 19th century -- Correspondence; FitzGerald, Edward, 1809-1883 -- Correspondence
July 2. All that precedes was written six weeks ago, when I was obliged
to go up to London on business. . . . I saw Alfred, and the rest of the
scavans. Thackeray is a great man: goes to Devonshire House, etc.: and
_his_ book (which is capital) is read by the Great: and will, I hope, do
them good. I heard but little music: the glorious Acis and Galatea; and
the redoubtable Jenny Lind, for the first time. I was disappointed in
her: but am told this is all my fault. As to naming her in the same
Olympiad with great old Pasta, I am sure that is ridiculous. The
Exhibition is like most others you have seen; worse perhaps. There is an
'Aaron' and a 'John the Baptist' by Etty far worse than the Saracen's
Head on Ludgate Hill. Moore is turned Picture dealer: and that high
Roman virtue in which he indulged is likely to suffer a Picture-dealer's
change, I think. Carlyle writes in the Examiner about Ireland: raves and
foams, but has nothing to propose. Spedding prospers with Bacon. Alfred
seemed to me in fair plight: much dining out: and his last Poem is well
liked I believe. Morton is still at Lisbon, I believe also: but I have
not written to him, nor heard from him. And now, my dear Frederic, I
must shut up. Do not neglect to write to me sometimes. Alfred said you
ought to be in England about your Grimsby Land.
_To E. B. Cowell_.
[? 1848.]
MY DEAR COWELL,
. . . I do not know that I praised Xenophon's imagination in recording
such things as Alcibiades at Lampsacus; {240} all I meant to say was that
the history was not dull which does record such facts, if it be for the
imagination of others to quicken them. . . . As to Sophocles, I will not
give up my old Titan. Is there not an infusion of Xenophon in Sophocles,
as compared to AEschylus,--a dilution? Sophocles is doubtless the better
artist, the more complete; but are we to expect anything but glimpses and
ruins of the divinest? Sophocles is a pure Greek temple; but AEschylus
is a rugged mountain, lashed by seas, and riven by thunderbolts: and
which is the most wonderful, and appalling? Or if one will have AEschylus
too a work of man, I say he is like a Gothic Cathedral, which the Germans
say did arise from the genius of man aspiring up to the immeasurable, and
reaching after the infinite in complexity and gloom, according as
Christianity elevated and widened men's minds. A dozen lines of AEschylus
have a more Almighty power on me than all Sophocles' plays; though I
would perhaps rather save Sophocles, as the consummation of Greek art,
than AEschylus' twelve lines, if it came to a choice which must be lost.
Besides these AEschyluses _trouble_ us with their grandeur and gloom; but
Sophocles is always soothing, complete, and satisfactory.
_To W. B. Donne_.
BOULGE, _Decr_. 27, [1848.]
MY DEAR DONNE,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account