Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 2FitzGerald, Edward
General
Letters of Edward FitzGerald, in Two Volumes. Vol. 2
FitzGerald, Edward
Authors, English -- 19th century -- Correspondence; FitzGerald, Edward, 1809-1883 -- Correspondence
I am writing to you because you say you like to hear from me. I dare
say, a Letter from your home, or mine, is acceptable in Madrid, which, by
the by, if Travellers' Stories be true, must be terrible this winter: and
I always try to stuff my Letters with all I can about other people more
or less worth hearing of. But for that I have but little to say,
certainly nothing worth your keeping. But if you like me to write, no
matter why. I wish I could find you a short Letter written to me this
time last year by C. Merivale, Dean of Ely, Roman Historian; a man of
infinite dry humour, and quaint fancy. I have put it away in some safe
place where (of course) I can't find it. Perhaps the like may happen to
yourself now and then. I tell him that some one should pick up his Table-
talk and Letter-talk: for he of course would not do it himself. I have
known him from College days, fifty years ago; but have never read his
History: never having read any History but Herodotus, I believe. But I
should like you to see how an English Dean and Roman Historian can write
in spite of Toga and Canonicals.
_December_ 22.
I left off when my Reader came to finish The Bride of Lammermoor; as
wonderful to me as ever. O, the Austens, Eliots, and even Thackerays,
won't eclipse Sir Walter for long.
To come down rather a little from him, my Calderon, which you speak
of--very many beside myself, with as much fair Dramatic Spirit, knowledge
of good English and English Verse, would do quite as well as you think I
do, if they would not hamper themselves with Forms of Verse, and Thought,
irreconcilable with English Language and English Ways of Thinking. I am
persuaded that, to keep Life in the Work (as Drama must) the Translator
(however inferior to his Original) must re-cast that original into his
own Likeness, more or less: the less like his original, so much the
worse: but still, the live Dog better than the dead Lion; in Drama, I
say. As to Epic, is not Cary still the best Dante? Cowper and Pope were
both Men of Genius, out of my Sphere; but whose Homer still holds its
own? The elaborately exact, or the 'teacup-time' Parody? Is not
Fairfax' Tasso good? I never read Harington's Ariosto, English or
Italian. Another shot have I made at Faust in Bayard Taylor's Version:
but I do not even get on with him as with Hayward, hampered as he
(Taylor) is with his allegiance to original metres, etc. His Notes I was
interested in: but I shall die ungoethed, I doubt, so far as Poetry goes:
I always believe he was Philosopher and Critic.
But, harking back to Calderon, surely you have seen the 'Magico' printed
from the Duc d'Osuna's original MS., with many variations from the text
as we have it. This volume is edited, in French, by 'Alfred Morel
Fatio,' printed at 'Heilbronn' (wherever that is), and to be bought of
'M. Murillo, Calle de Alcala, Num. 18, Madrid.' It contains a Facsimile
of the old Boy's MS. I will send you my Copy if there be 'no Coal in
Newcastle.'
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account