Letters to "The Times" upon War and Neutrality (1881-1920)Holland, Thomas Erskine
History
Letters to "The Times" upon War and Neutrality (1881-1920)
Holland, Thomas Erskine
Neutrality; War (International law)
The divergence which has so long existed between Anglo-American
and Continental views upon contraband was very noticeable at
the commencement of the war of 1898, which gave occasion to the
letter which immediately follows. While the Spanish Decree of
April 23 set out only one list of contraband goods, the United
States Instructions of June 20 recognised two lists--viz. of
"absolute" and of "conditional" contraband, including under the
latter head "coal when destined for a naval station, a port of
call, or a ship or ships of the enemy; materials for the
construction of railways or telegraphs, and money, when such
materials or money are destined for an enemy's forces,
provisions, when destined for an enemy's ship or ships, for a
place besieged."
An answer was thus supplied to the question suggested in this
letter, as to articles _ancipitis usus_.
CONTRABAND OF WAR
Sir,--I fear that the mercantile community will hardly profit so much as
the managers of the Atlas Steamship Company seem to expect by the
information contained in their letter which you print this morning. It
was, indeed, unlikely that the courteous reply of the Assistant
Secretary of State at Washington to the enquiry addressed to him by the
New York agents of the company would contain a declaration of the policy
of the United States with reference to contraband of war. The threefold
classification of "merchandise" (not of "contraband") quoted in the
reply occurs, in the judgment of the Supreme Court in the well-known
case of the _Peterhoff_ (5 Wallace, 58), but it is substantially that of
Grotius, and has long been accepted in this country and in the United
States, while the Continent is, generally speaking, inclined to deny the
existence of "contraband by accident," and to recognise only such a
restricted list of contraband as was contained in the Spanish decree of
April 24 last.
The questions upon which shippers are really desirous of information
(which they are, however, perhaps not likely to obtain, otherwise than
from decisions of prize Courts) are of a less elementary character. They
would like to know what articles _ancipitis usus_ ("used for purposes of
war or peace according to circumstances") will be treated by the United
States as contraband, and with what penalty the carriage of such
articles will be visited--_i.e._ whether by confiscation or merely by
pre-emption.
I am, Sir, your obedient servant,
T. E. HOLLAND.
Oxford, May 9 (1898).
The four letters which next follow also relate to the two
classes of contraband goods, with especial reference to the
character attributed to foodstuffs, coal and cotton.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account