Letters written in France, to a friend in London, between the month of November 1794, and the month of May 1795Tench, Watkin
History
Letters written in France, to a friend in London, between the month of November 1794, and the month of May 1795
Tench, Watkin
France -- History -- Revolution, 1789-1799 -- Personal narratives, British; Tench, Watkin, 1759?-1833 -- Correspondence
Our only difficulty now was to find a conveyance. Admiral Bligh
therefore expressed a wish to his friend that he might be suffered to
hire a boat, which he would engage to send back immediately on being
landed on the nearest part of the English shore. This proposition
(which, considering the times, was rather of a delicate nature) was
acceded to by Monsieur Villaret; who added, that he would take care that
she should be properly fitted and victualled for us; however in the
afternoon a lucky occurrence prevented us from putting his generous zeal
to serve us to farther proof:----An American gentleman, who knew our
situation, brought a little Danish master of a brig to our inn where we
had dined (Admiral Villaret being engaged to the representatives) with
whom we presently concluded an agreement for our passage. As the Dane
wished to depart on the next day, it became again necessary to trouble
Monsieur Villaret to urge the completion of our passports for sailing
out of the harbour; and for this purpose he appointed to meet us at nine
in the evening, at the house of the representatives. Thither, at the
hour agreed upon, we repaired, and found him. He conducted us into a
spacious garden, and introduced us to the representatives, Topsent,
Vernon, and Harmand, who received us with great cordiality; and when
they learned that Admiral Bligh had been all day in town, chided Admiral
Villaret for not having brought us with him to dine with them. These
gentlemen, however, declined taking any part in granting the passports
until the arrival of their colleague Champeaux, who was momently
expected. We, therefore, continued walking on the terrace, and
conversing on general subjects, which unavoidably led to the grand and
only enquiry that seems to agitate the minds of Frenchmen:----the politics
of the day, as connected with the revolution.----They spoke in respectful
terms of our national character, and pathetically lamented the war
between England and France, calling it an unhappy and fruitless contest
to both parties. It was, they said, past human comprehension to account
for the ceaseless implacable enmity between two nations, which by their
valour, opulence, and enlightened character, were fitted to hold the
balance, and dictate the tranquillity of Europe. I listened in silence.
These men had no _sans-culottism_ about them, either in their manners,
language, or dress; the two first were civil, moderate and correct, and
the latter was gentlemanlike and respectable. Had it been my desire, it
was not my interest, to interrupt or oppose them. I ventured, however,
once or twice to slightly demur at one of their propositions, in order
to draw out their sentiments more fully; which occasioned these words
(from Vernon, I think) to be repeated with emphasis, “_France will be a
republic! and England neither shall, nor ought to, interfere in our
internal concerns_.” This conversation made a deep impression upon me,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account