Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 16
General
Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern — Volume 16
Literature -- Collections
It appears that this dislike, and the ignorance consequent
upon it, applied to the works of Carlyle. Now, we may have
much or little faith in Carlyle as a philosopher or as a historian.
Half-lights and half-truths may be the utmost which, in these
departments, his works will be found to yield. But the total
want of sympathy is the more noteworthy, because the resemblances,
though partial, are both numerous and substantial between
these two remarkable men and powerful writers, as well
in their strength as in their weakness. Both are honest; and
both, notwithstanding honesty, are partisans. Each is vastly,
though diversely, powerful in expression; and each is more powerful
in expression than in thought. Both are, though variously,
poets using the vehicle of prose. Both have the power of portraitures,
extraordinary for vividness and strength. For comprehensive
disquisition, for balanced and impartial judgments, the
world will probably resort to neither; and if Carlyle gains on the
comparison in his strong sense of the inward and the ideal, he
loses in the absolute and violent character of his one-sidedness.
Without doubt, Carlyle's licentious though striking peculiarities
of style have been of a nature allowably to repel, so far as they
go, one who was so rigid as Macaulay in his literary orthodoxy,
and who so highly appreciated, and with such expenditure of
labor, all that relates to the exterior or body of a book. Still,
if there be resemblances so strong, the want of appreciation,
which has possibly been reciprocal, seems to be partly of that
nature which Aristotle would have explained by his favorite
proverb, [Greek: keramens keramei].[D] The discrepancy is like the discrepancy
[Pg 6368]
of colors that are too near. Carlyle is at least a great fact in
the literature of his time, and has contributed largely,—in some
respects too largely,—toward forming its characteristic habits of
thought. But on these very grounds he should not have been
excluded from the horizon of a mind like Macaulay's, with all its
large and varied and most active interests....
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account