A further important contribution was made by Baur[550] in his study of
_Collema crispum_[551]. There occur in nature two forms of this lichen,
one of them crowded with apothecia and spermogonia, the other with a
more luxuriant thallus, but with few apothecia and no spermogonia.
On the latter almost sterile form Baur found in spring and again in
autumn immense numbers of carpogonia—about one thousand in a medium
sized thallus—which nearly all gradually lost the characteristics of
reproductive organs, and, anastomising with other hyphae, became part of
the vegetative system. In a few cases in which, presumably, a spermatium
had fused with a trichogyne, very large apothecia had developed.
As the first-mentioned form was always crowded with apothecia in every
stage of development, as well as with carpogonia and spermogonia, it
seemed natural to conclude that the difference was entirely due to
the presence or absence of spermatia in sufficient numbers to ensure
fertilization. The period during which copulation is possible passes
very rapidly, though subsequent development is slow, occupying about
half-a-year from the time of fertilization to the formation of the first
ascus.
Baur confirmed Stahl’s observations on the various developmental changes.
In several instances he found a spermatium fused with the trichogyne,
though he could not see continuity between the lumina of the fusing
cells. After copulation with the spermatium the trichogyne nucleus,
which occupied the lower third of the terminal cell, had disappeared,
and the plasma contents had acquired a deeper tint; the other trichogyne
cells, which had also lost their nuclei, were partly collapsed owing
to the pressure of the surrounding tissue, and openings were plainly
visible through some of the swollen septa, especially of the lower cells.
In addition the ascogonial cells, all of which were uninucleate, had
increased in number by intercalary division. Plasma connections were
opened from cell to cell, but only in the primary septa, the later formed
cell-membranes being continuous. Ascogenous hyphae had branched out from
the ascogonium as a series of uninucleate cell rows from which the asci
finally arose.
Baur’s interpretation was that the first cell of the ascogonium reached
by the male nucleus after its passage down through the cells of the
trichogyne represented the egg-cell, and that, after fusion, the
resultant nucleus divided, and a daughter nucleus passed on to the other
auxiliary-cells. No male nucleus nor fusion of nuclei was, however,
observed by him, and his deductions rest on conjecture.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account