_b._ ON GENERAL DEVELOPMENT. Lichens are very strongly influenced by
abundance or by lack of moisture. The contour of the large majority
of species is concentric, but they become excentric owing to a more
vigorous development towards the side of damper exposure, hence the
frequent one-sided increase of monophyllous species such as _Umbilicaria
pustulata_. Wainio[867] observed that species of _Cladonia_ growing
in dry places, and exposed to full sunlight, showed a tendency not to
develop scyphi, the dry conditions hindering the full formation of the
secondary thallus. As an instance may be cited _Cl. foliacea_, in which
the primary thallus is much the most abundantly developed, its favourite
habitat being the exposed sandy soil of sea-dunes.
Too great moisture is however harmful: Nienburg[868] has recorded his
observations on _Sphyridium_ (_Baeomyces rufus_): on clay soil the
thallus was pulverulent, while on stones or other dryer substratum it was
granular—warted or even somewhat squamulose.
_Parmelia physodes_ rarely forms fruits, but when growing in an
atmosphere constantly charged with moisture[869], apothecia are more
readily developed, and the same observation has been made in connection
with other usually barren lichens. It has been suggested that, in these
lichens, the abrupt change from moist to dry conditions may have a
harmful effect on the developing ascogonium.
The perithecia of _Pyrenula nitida_ are smaller on smooth bark[870] such
as that of _Corylus_, _Carpinu_s, etc., probably because the even surface
does not retain water.
IV. ILLUMINATION OF LICHENS
A. EFFECT OF LIGHT ON THE THALLUS
As fungi possess no chlorophyll, their vegetative body has little or no
use for light and often develops in partial or total darkness. In lichens
the alga requires more or less direct illumination; the lichen fungus,
therefore, in response to that requirement has come out into the open:
it is an adaptation to the symbiotic life, though some lichens, such as
those immersed in the substratum, grow with very little light. Like other
plants they are sensitive to changes of illumination: some species are
shade plants, while others are as truly sun plants, and others again are
able to adapt themselves to varying degrees of light.
Wiesner[871] made a series of exact observations on what he has
termed the “light-use” of various plants. He took as his standard of
unity for the higher plants the amount of light required to darken
photographic paper in one second. When dealing with lichens he adopted
a more arbitrary standard, calculating as the unit the average amount
of light that lichens would receive in entirely unshaded positions. He
does not take account of the strength or duration of the light, and
the conclusions he draws, though interesting and instructive, are only
comparative.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account