Life and bloody career of the executed criminal, James Copeland, the great Southern land piratePitts, J. R. S. (James Robert Soda)
History
Life and bloody career of the executed criminal, James Copeland, the great Southern land pirate
Pitts, J. R. S. (James Robert Soda)
Copeland, James, 1823-1857; Criminals -- Gulf States -- Biography
Probate Court was then in session, and that he could not be absent for
the period of time necessarily required in a task of this sort without
material injury to business transactions and the duties of his office.
To this unqualified refusal Shoemake sat for a moment in a silent
pause. If the Sheriff himself could not accompany him, he had no desire
to have any of the deputies with him.
Appearing very much disappointed in this object to decoy off the
Sheriff, and feeling satisfied that all further attempts in this
direction would prove abortive, he all at once exhibited a different
phase of countenance, and in a jocular manner slapped the Sheriff on
the knee, remarking at the same time, “How or where did you get my
name associated with the Copeland Clan?” The Sheriff answered, “Why,
my dear sir, do you acknowledge the name as recorded in Copeland’s
confessions as belonging to you?” Shoemake made no direct reply, but
observed that the people about where he lived were endeavoring to
saddle the reflections on him, and that the same was having a very
deleterious effect against him. This being so, he requested of the
Sheriff, as an act of favor or kindness, to have his name erased, or
disposed of in some other way, such as would remove the odium attached,
and that he believed the Sheriff to have the power to do all this with
propriety. The Sheriff was a little startled as well as excited at such
an absurd proposition, and quickly replied to the following effect:
“Your requested favor cannot be performed. The matter has altogether
passed out of my hands, and it is utterly beyond my control to make any
changes. I have only given publicity to the confessions of Copeland,
and if he has wrongfully implicated any one the remedy is by an action
of law, or better still, by a counter statement supported by the
testimony of those whose veracity cannot be doubted.”
Shoemake, discomfitted in his own case on this point, then referred
to a correspondence betwixt himself, George A. Cleaveland and others,
all of whom were implicated in the pamphlet complained of, and said,
from all the information he could gather, unless something was done to
relieve the complainants the Sheriff would be sure to have more or less
trouble from that quarter. The reply made was pretty much to the same
effect as in his own individual case—no hope of success as far as the
Sheriff was concerned.
The next question brought forward was an inquiry about a communication
from some one at DeKalb, Miss., concerning himself. He was answered
in the affirmative to the effect that such a communication had been
received. “Very well,” said he, “will you be so kind as to let me see
it?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account