Water is a constituent element of the organisms. They contain fixed
proportions for the same tissue, proportions varying from one tissue to
another (between 2∕3 and 9∕10). The cell of a living tissue requires
around it an aqueous atmosphere, formed by the different juices of the
organism, the interstitial liquids, the blood, and the lymph. We are
deceived by appearances when we distinguish between aerial, aquatic,
and land-dwelling animals, and when we speak of the air, the water,
and the land as their natural environment. If we go to the bottom
of things, and fix our attention on the real living unities, on the
cells of which the organism is composed, we shall find around them
the juices, rich in water, which are their real environment. If these
juices are diluted or concentrated the least in the world, life stops.
The cell, the whole animal, falls into a state of latent life, or
dies. “All living beings are aquatic,” said Claude Bernard. “Beings
that live in the air are in reality wandering aquariums,” said another
physiologist. “No moisture, no life,” wrote Preyer. The environment
must contain water, but it must contain it in certain proportions. In
the higher animals there is a mechanism which works automatically to
keep at a constant level the quantity of water in the blood. Researches
on the lavage of the blood (A. Dastre and Loye) have clearly shown
this.
Oxygen is also necessary to life. It is the _pabulum vitæ_. But the
discovery of the beings called by Pasteur _anaerobia_ appears to
contradict this statement. Pfeffer, the illustrious botanist, was
certain, in 1897, that the dogma of the necessity of oxygen no longer
held good. This is no longer tenable. In 1898 Beijerinck carried out
most careful researches on anaerobia said to have been cultivated in a
vacuum, such as the _bacteria of tetanus_ and the _septic vibrion_; or
on those to which oxygen seems to be a poison, such as the _butyric_
and the _butylic ferments_, the anaerobia of putrefaction, the reducing
spirilla of the sulphates. All use free oxygen. They consume very
little it is true; they are micro-aerobia. The other organisms, on
the contrary, need more. They are macro-aerobia or simply _aerobia_.
Besides, if the so-called anaerobia take little or no free oxygen, it
matters little. They take the oxygen in combination. It may be said
with L. Errera that they have an affinity for oxygen, for they extract
it from its combinations, and that “they are so well adapted to this
mode of existence that life in the open air being too easy no longer
suits them.” There are for the different animal species different
optima of oxygen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account