_The Specific Form depends on the sum of Material Conditions of the
Body and the Medium._—The consideration of mineral bodies shows us
form dependent on the physico-chemical conditions of the body and the
medium. The form depends mainly on physical conditions in the cases
of a drop of water falling from a tap, of the liquid meniscus in a
narrow tube, of a small navel-shaped mass of mercury on a marble slab,
of a drop of oil “emulsioned” in a solution, and of the metal which
is hardened by hammering or annealed. In the case of crystals the
form depends more on chemical conditions. It is crystallization which
has introduced into physics the idea that has now become a kind of
postulate—namely, that the specific form is connected with the chemical
composition. However, it is sufficient to instance the dimorphism
of a simple body, such as sulphur, sometimes prismatic, sometimes
octahedric, to realize that substance is only one of the factors of
form, and that the physical conditions of the body and of the medium
are other factors quite as influential.
_Is the Specific Form a Property of the Chemical Substance?_—How much
truer this restriction would be if we consider, instead of a given
chemical compound, an astonishingly complex mixture, such as protoplasm
or living matter, or the more complex organism still—the cell, the
plastid.
Are there not great differences between the substance of the cellular
protoplasm, or cytoplasmic substance, and that of the nucleus? Should
we not distinguish in the former the hyaloplasmic substance; the
microsomic in the microsomes; the linin between its granulations; the
centrosomic in the centrosome; the archoplasmic in the attraction
sphere; not to mention the different leucins, the vacuolar juice, and
the various inclusions? And in the nucleus must we not consider the
nuclear juice, the substance of the chromosomes, and that of the
nucleoles? And is not each of these probably a very complex mixture?
However, it is to this mixture that we attribute the possession
of a form, in virtue of and by extension of the principles of
crystallization, which definitely teach us that these mixtures cannot
have form; that form is the attribute of pure bodies, and is only
obtained by the separation of the blended parts—_i.e._, by a return
to homogeneity. There are therefore very good reasons for hesitating
before we transfer the absolute principle of the dependence between
chemical form and composition, as some philosophical biologists have
done, from the physical sciences—where it is already subject to serious
restrictions—to the biological sciences.
Le Dantec, however, has made this principle the basis of his biological
system. He therefore finds in the crystal the model of the living
being. He thus gives a physical basis to life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account