_Mobility and Mutability of the Sidereal World._—This is not true,
in the first place, of the sidereal bodies. The ancients held the
sidereal world to be immutable and incorruptible. The doctrine of
the incorruptibility of the heavens prevailed up to the seventeenth
century. The observers who at that epoch directed towards the heavens
the first telescope, which Galileo had just invented, were struck with
astonishment at discovering a change in that celestial firmament which
they had hitherto believed incorruptible, and at perceiving a new star
that appeared in the constellation Ophiuchus. Such changes no longer
surprise us. The cosmogonic system of Laplace has become familiar to
all cultivated minds, and every one is accustomed to the idea of the
continual mobility and evolution of the celestial world. “The stars
have not always existed,” writes M. Faye; “they have had a period of
formation; they will likewise have a period of decline, followed by
final extinction.”
Thus all the bodies of inanimate nature are not eternal and immutable;
the celestial bodies are eminently susceptible of evolution, slow
indeed with that we observe on the surface of our globe; but this
disproportion, corresponding to the immensity of time and of cosmic
spaces as compared with terrestrial measurements, should not mislead us
as to the fundamental analogy of the phenomena.
§ 1. THE MOVEMENT OF PARTICLES AND MOLECULES IN BRUTE BODIES.
It is not only in celestial spaces that we must search for that
mobility of brute matter which imitates the mobility of living matter.
In order to find it we have only to look about us, or to inquire from
physicists and chemists.
As far as geologists are concerned, M. le Dantec tells us somewhere of
one who divided minerals into _living rocks_—rocks capable of change
of structure, of evolution under the influence of atmospheric causes;
and _dead rocks_—rocks which, like clay, have found at the end of all
their changes a final state of repose. Jerome Cardan, a celebrated
scientist of the sixteenth century, at once mathematician, naturalist,
and physician, declared not only that stones live, but that they suffer
from disease, grow old, and die. The jewellers of the present day use
similar language of certain precious stones; the torquoise, for example.
The alchemists carried these ideas to an extreme. It is not necessary
here to recall the past, to evoke the hermetic beliefs and the dreams
of the alchemists, who held that the different kinds of matter lived,
developed, and were transmuted into each other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account