_The Existence of the Brownian Movement._—The simplest way of judging
of the working activity of matter is to observe it when the liberty of
the particles is not interfered with by the action of the neighbouring
particles. We approximate to this condition when we watch, through the
microscope, grains of dust suspended in a liquid, or globules of oil
suspended in water. Now what we see is well known to all microscopists.
If the granulations are sufficiently small, they seem to be never at
rest. They are animated by a kind of incessant tremor; we see the
phenomena called the “Brownian movement.” This movement has struck
all observers since the invention of the magnifying glass or simple
microscope. But the English botanist, Brown, in 1827, made it the
object of special research and gave it his name. The exact explanation
of it remained for a long time obscure. It was given in 1894 by M.
Gouy, the learned physicist of the Faculty of Lyons.
The observer who for the first time looks through the microscope at
a drop of water from the river, from the sea, or from any ordinary
source—that is to say, water not specially purified—is struck with
surprise and admiration at the motion revealed to him. Infusoria,
microscopic articulata, and various micro-organisms people the
microscopic field, and animate it by their movements; but at the same
time all sorts of particles are also agitated, particles which cannot
be considered as living beings, and which are, in fact, nothing but
organic detritus, mineral dust, and debris of every description. Very
often the singular movements of these granulations, which simulate up
to a certain point those of living beings, have perplexed the observer
or led him to erroneous conclusions, and the bodies have been taken for
animalcules or for bacteria.
_Characters of this Movement._—But it is as a rule quite easy to avoid
this confusion. The Brownian movement is a kind of oscillation, a
stationary, dancing to-and-fro movement. It is a Saint Vitus’s dance
on one and the same spot, and is thus distinguished from the movements
of displacement customary with animate beings. Each particle has its
own special dance. Each one acts on its own account, independently of
its neighbour. There is, however, in the execution of these individual
oscillations a kind of common and regular character which arises from
the fact that their amplitudes differ little from each other. The
largest particles are the slowest; when above four thousandths of a
millimetre in diameter, they almost cease to be mobile. The smallest
are the most active. When so small as to be barely visible in the
microscope, the movement is extremely rapid, and can only occasionally
be perceived. It is probable that it would be still more accelerated in
smaller objects; but the latter will always escape our observation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account