We cannot yet actually measure chemical activity directly, but we know
that chemical action may give rise to all other phenomenal modalities.
It is their most ordinary source, and it is to it that industries
appeal to obtain heat, electricity, and mechanical action. In the
steam engine, for instance, the work that is received arises from the
combustion of carbon by the oxygen of the air. This gives rise to the
heat which vaporizes the water, produces the tension of the steam,
and ultimately produces the displacement of the piston. The theory of
the steam engine might be reduced to these two propositions: chemical
activity gives rise to heat, and heat gives rise to motion; or to use
the language to which the reader by now will be accustomed, chemical
energy is transformed into thermal energy, and that into mechanical
energy. It is a series of phases and of instantaneous changes, and the
exchange is always affected according to a fixed rate.
_The Measurement of Chemical Energy._—Our knowledge of chemical energy
is less advanced than that of the energies of heat and sensible motion.
We have not yet reached the stage of numerical verifications. We can
only therefore affirm the equivalence of chemical and thermal energies
without the aid of numerical constants, because we do not yet, in
the present state of science, know how to measure chemical energy
directly. Other known energies are always the product of two factors:
the mechanical energy of position, or work, is measured by the product
of the force _f_, and the displacement _s_; work = _fs_; the mechanical
energy of motion, U = 1∕2_mv^2_, is measured by the product of the mass
into half the square of the velocity. Thermal energy is measured by
the product of the temperature and the specific heat; electric energy
by the product of the quantity of electricity (in coulombs) and of the
electromotive force (in volts). As for chemical energy, we guess that
it may be valued directly according to Berthollet’s system, adopted by
the Norwegian chemists, Guldberg and Waage, by means of the product of
the masses and of a force, or co-efficient of affinity, which depends
on the nature of the substances which are brought together, on the
temperature, and on the other physical circumstances of the reaction.
On the other hand, the researches of M. Berthelot enable us in many
cases to obtain an indirect valuation in terms of the equivalent heat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account