_It involves the Law of Equivalence._—Here we may be content with
noticing that the law of the conservation of energy involves the
existence of relations of equivalence between the different varieties.
A certain quantity of a given energy, measured, as we have seen, by
the product of two factors, is equivalent to a certain fixed quantity
of quite a different form of energy into which it may be converted.
The laws which govern energetic transformations therefore contain,
from both the qualitative and the quantitative points of view, all the
connections of the phenomena of the universe. To study these laws in
their detail is the task that physics must take upon itself.
The conversion one into the other of the different forms of energy by
means of equivalents is only a possibility. It is subject, in fact, to
all sorts of restrictions, of which the most important are due to the
second principle.
§ 8. CARNOT’S PRINCIPLE. ITS GENERALITY.
The second fundamental principle is that of the transformations of
equilibrium, or of the conditions of reversibility, or again, Carnot’s
principle. This principle, which first assumed a concrete form in
thermodynamics, has been very widely extended. It has reached a degree
of generality such that contemporary theoretical physicists such as
Lord Kelvin, Le Châtelier, etc., consider it the universal law of
physical, mechanical, and chemical equilibrium.
Carnot’s principle contains, as was shown by G. Robin, d’Alembert’s
principle of virtual velocities, and according to physicists of
to-day, as we have just remarked, it contains the laws peculiar to
physico-chemical equilibrium. The application of this principle
gives us the differential equations from which are derived numerical
relations between the different energies, or the different modalities
of universal energy.
_Its Character._—It is very remarkable that we cannot give a general
enunciation of this principle which by its revealing power has changed
the face of physics. This is because it is less a law, properly so
called, than a method or manner of interpreting the relations of the
different forms of energy, and particularly the relations of heat and
mechanical energy.
_Conversion of Work into Heat and Vice-versâ._—The conversion of
work into heat is accomplished without difficulty. For example, the
hammering of a piece of iron on an anvil may bring it to a red heat.
A shell which passes through an armour plate is heated, and melts and
volatilizes the metal all round the hole it has made. By utilizing
mechanical action under the form of friction all energy can be
converted into heat.
The inverse transformation of heat into work, on the contrary, cannot
be complete. The best motor that we can think of, and _à fortiori_ the
best we can realize, can only transform a third or a fourth of the heat
with which it is supplied.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account