Some authors consider these bodies as pure thermogens. When alcohol
is ingested in moderate doses, they say that about a tenth of the
quantity absorbed becomes fixed in the living tissues; the rest is
“circulating alcohol.” It is oxidized directly in the blood and in
the lymph, without intervening in the vital functions other than by
the heat it produces. From the point of view of the energetic theory
these are not real foods, because their potential energy is not
transformed into any kind of vital energy, but passes at once to the
thermal form. On the other hand, other physiologists look upon alcohol
as really a food. According to them everything is called a food which
is transformed in the organism with the production of heat; and they
measure the nutritive value of a substance by the number of Calories
it can give up to the organism. So that alcohol would be a better food
than carbohydrated and nitrogenous substances. A definite quantity of
alcohol, a gramme for instance, is equivalent from the thermal point of
view to 1.66 grammes of sugar, 1.44 of albumen, or 0.73 of fat. These
quantities would be _isodynamic_.
Experiment has not entirely decided for or against this theory.
However, the first tests have not been very favourable to it.
The researches of C. von Noorden and his pupils, Stammreich and
Miura, have clearly and directly established that alcohol cannot
be substituted in a maintenance ration for an exactly isodynamic
quantity of carbohydrates. If the substitution is effected, a ration
only just capable of maintaining the organism in equilibrium becomes
insufficient. The animal decreases in weight. It loses more nitrogenous
matter than it can recover from its diet, and this situation cannot be
sustained for long. On the other hand, the celebrated researches of
the American physiologist, Atwater, would plead, on the contrary, in
favour of almost isodynamic substitution. Finally, Duclaux has shown
that alcohol is a real food, biothermogenic for certain vegetable
organisms. But urea is also a food for _micrococcus ureæ_. It does not
follow that it is a food for mammals. We have not reached the solution
yet—_adhuc sub judice_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account