to move you never a deale to gyve credence vnto her or her reuelations, For the said lord knew no mor_e_ certente of her or of her reuelations than ye dyd by her owne reaport. And as towching the saing of Amos the prophete, I thinke veryly the same moved you but a litell to herkyn vnto her, for sythe the co_n_su_m_mation and thende of thold testame_n_t and sythens the passion of Christ god hathe doen many greate and notable thing_es_ in the worl[d]e, whereof he shewed no thing to his p_ro_phet_es_ that hath co_m_men to the knowlege of men. My lord all thes thinges moved you not to gyve credence vnto her, but only the very mater whereupon she made her fals p_ro_ficyes to whiche mater ye were so affected (as ye be noted to be on al mat_er_s whiche ye enter ons into) that nothing could com amysse that made for that purpose And her_e_ I appelle yo_ur_ conscience and instantly desire you to aunswer. Whether if she had shewed you as many reuelationsf or the co_n_firmation of the king_es_ grac_es_ marriage whiche he now enjoyeth as she did to the co_n_trary, ye wold haue gyven as muche credence to her as ye haue doen, and wold haue let the trial of her and of her reuelations to ou_er_passe thes many yer_es_, wher_e_ ye dwelt not from her but xx mylys, in the same shir_e_, wher_e_ her traunses and disfiguring_es_ and p_ro_phecyes in her traunses wer_e_ surmised and countrefeyd. And if p_er_caas ye wol sey (as it ‹is› not vnlike but ye wol sey mynded as ye wer_e_ wont to be) that the mat_e_rs be not like, for the Law of god in yo_ur_ opinion standeth w_i_t_h_ the one and not w_i_t_h_ thother. Suerly my lord I suppose this had been no greate cause mor_e_ to reiect the one than thother for ye know by histories of the bible that god may by his reuelation dispense w_i_t_h_ his owne Law, as w_i_t_h_ the[810] Israelit_es_ spoyling the egiptians and w_i_t_h_ Jacob to haue iiij wifes, and suche other[811].