That Griffith, on the very edge of Hollywood, had made the great picture
then sweeping the country, was something on which to “make a few
remarks,” though it is unlikely that even the most sanguine residents
guessed that within a comparatively brief time, their little suburb
would become the center of one of the world’s richest industries; a
collection of amazing architectural construction; a strange, irrational
region, in and about whose environs frail cities and quaint villages,
fair palaces and weird ships and oceans, would appear and vanish, beyond
the dreams of all the fairylands of time and change; that with these
things would assemble an exhibit of feminine loveliness and masculine
perfection, of human freaks and human vanities, such as probably no
other planet could show.
The change began quickly enough, now. There was money to be made in
Hollywood—not only by producers, but by actors. On Broadway, men and
women with lean parts, or no parts at all, turned their eyes westward.
The exodus set in. The word “Hollywood” began to be passed about like
some magic bauble, a talisman. Once more, California held out to men and
women a lure of gold.
* * * * *
The little group of players on Sunset Boulevard hardly knew what to make
of the first incursion of “real actors” that swept in upon them. They
had two ideas about it: they wondered if they would be able to keep
their jobs, and if so, would they learn how to act. They realized,
presently, that it made very little difference to them. They did keep
their jobs, and they did not learn how to act—not in the stage way. It
was the newcomers who had to learn—if they stayed.
Most of them did stay—adapted themselves. Producers with new, big
undertakings, were all about. Griffith himself, returning from first
showings of the “Birth,” began on what promised to be a still more
important, more expensive, picture.
It started as rather a small venture, with Mae Marsh and Bobby Harron in
the leading parts. It was to be called “The Mother and the Law,” based
upon a famous murder case, wherein an innocent man, through
intolerance—man’s inhumanity to man—was brought to the foot of the
scaffold.
Lillian was not to have a part in this new play. For one thing, she was
working in another picture—as Annie, in “Enoch Arden”—one of the best of
her early films—and in Richard Harding Davis’ story of “Captain
Macklin.” And then, Griffith perhaps did not think it wise to push her
forward too fast.
But one night, after a day of hard rehearsal, he picked up a copy of
Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass,” and his eye caught:
... endlessly rocks the cradle,
Uniter of Here and Hereafter.
He saw a picture: a girl—Lillian—endlessly rocking the cradle of
humanity, binding the ages together—ages of human intolerance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account