Life and literature in the Roman republicFrank, Tenney
History
Life and literature in the Roman republic
Frank, Tenney
Latin literature -- History and criticism; Rome -- Intellectual life
Unfortunately a satisfying philosophy did not emerge to take the place
of the departing devotion—which though of no great moral worth had
possessed a certain constraining influence. The soundest Greek philosophy
was itself out of date at home and was nowhere taught abroad. Plato’s
great faith in ratiocination had created a highly imaged idealism of
exceedingly great beauty—moral as well as aesthetic. But it had not
withstood the prying curiosity of his sophisticated Greek pupils.
Aristotle, afraid of the imagination, had set out almost at once to
build science upon a foundation of careful and minute observation before
trusting to imagination again. Epicurus, without sufficient equipment
in science but stirred by a healthy respect for nature, had evolved a
materialistic system on the theories of Democritus and Leucippus, which
assumed an evolutionary process of creation without divine intervention.
The system was attractive, but so full of inconsistencies and untested
hypotheses that it led the shrewder young men of Athens into complete
agnosticism. Those who were inclined to mysticism took refuge in Zeno’s
equally facile pantheism. By the time the Romans were ready to delve into
metaphysics, the logical flaws in all systems had been pointed out by the
Greeks themselves. The world of thought was in confusion. Men had lost
faith in their power to solve the riddle of the universe. Professional
philosophers were quarrelling, and the rest were turning away in dismay
to nearer tasks.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account