Life and works of Alexander Csoma de Körös : $b A biography compiled chiefly from hitherto unpublished dataDuka, Tivadar
History
Life and works of Alexander Csoma de Körös : $b A biography compiled chiefly from hitherto unpublished data
Duka, Tivadar
Kőrösi Csoma, Sándor, 1784-1842
[5] Pupil-servants occupy a position similar to that of sizars at the
English colleges in past times.
[6] “Revue des deux Mondes,” vol. xix. p. 50 et seqq.
[7] Preface to the “Tibetan Dictionary.”
[8] γὰρ ὐμῖν. Recensione Heyne. Londini, 1823.
[9] The full name in Hungarian is Körösi Csoma Sándor, which means in
English, Alexander Csoma of Körös. The family name is Csoma, and the
word Körösi, meaning of Körös, stands as a designation, to show that he
is a noble of Körös.
Körösi, although an adjective, may be used either alone or as above,
after Alexander, but in that case Csoma must be omitted; that is to
say, Alexander Csoma Körösi would be a mistake.
The terminal i in Körösi means of, hence de cannot stand before Körösi.
When de is used, Körös must follow.
[10] Siculus in Latin, Székely in Hungarian, Székler in German and
other continental languages.
[11] “Tibetan Tales,” by W. R. S. Ralston, M.A. Trübner & Co., London,
1882.
[12] An abridged English edition of B. Hügel’s works, with Major
Jervis’s annotations, appeared in 1845.
[13] See “Alphabetum Tibetanum, studio et labore, Fr. Augustini Antonii
Georgii.” Romæ, 1762, pag. 820.
[14] “Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal,” vol. ii., 1844, note
to Dr. Campbell’s paper.
[15] Székler, military nobles.
[16] Kulu.
[17] Moorcroft’s “Travels,” edited by H. H. Wilson, vol. i. p. 338.
[18] Preface to Moorcroft’s “Travels,” edited by H. H. Wilson.
[19] See Prinsep’s Report, dated 5th January 1834, in chap. ix.
[20] Moorcroft’s “Travels”, vol. ii. p. 383.
[21] See Yule’s “Marco Polo,” vol. i. p. 209, regarding Buddhist ritual
in China.
[22] The Hungarian.
[23] 1825.
[24] Drâkshâ.
[25] Deductions based upon the etymology and similarity in the
pronunciation of certain words, are not safe grounds upon which to
rest scientific conclusions. Csoma has frequently shown his distrust
of such. Yet such an objection need not preclude our noting down any
striking examples which we may have fallen in with.
What may have been the faith of the Magyar ancestors is not yet
decided; this subject demands yet further investigation, especially
in the direction in which Csoma laboured.
Csoma says, with reference to the study of Tibetan, and especially
of the Sanskrit, that his countrymen will find in it a fund of
information respecting their national origin, manners, customs, and
idiom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account