Life and writings of Amelia BloomerBloomer, D. C. (Dexter C.)
History
Life and writings of Amelia Bloomer
Bloomer, D. C. (Dexter C.)
Bloomer, Amelia Jenks, 1818-1894; Women's rights -- United States
From what I have said you will of course understand that I hold,
not only that the exclusion of woman from the ballot-box is
grossly unjust, but that is her duty—so soon as she is permitted
to do so—to go to it and cast her vote along with her husband and
brother; and that, until she shall do so, we can never expect to
have a perfectly just and upright government under which the rights
of the people—of all the people—are respected and secured.
It is objected that it does not belong to woman’s sphere to take
part in the selection of her rulers, or the enactment of laws to
which she is subject.
This is mere matter of opinion. Woman’s sphere, like man’s sphere,
varies according to the aspect under which we view it, or the
circumstances in which she may be placed. A vast majority of the
British nation would deny the assumption that Queen Victoria is
out of her sphere in reigning over an empire of an hundred and
fifty millions of souls! And if she is not out of her sphere in
presiding over the destinies of a vast empire, why should any woman
in this republic be denied her place among a nation of sovereigns?
There is no positive rule by which to fix woman’s sphere, except
that of capacity. It is to be found, I should say, wherever duty
or interest may call her,—whether to the kitchen, the parlor, the
nursery, the workshop or the public assembly. And, most certainly,
no narrow contracted view of her sphere can suffice to deprive her
of any of those rights which she has inherited with her being.
Again, it is objected that it would be immodest and ‘unbecoming a
lady’ for women to go to the ballot-box to vote, or to the halls of
the capitol to legislate.
This, too, is mere matter of opinion, and depends for its
correctness upon the particular fashions or customs of the
people. In deciding upon what is appropriate or inappropriate for
individuals or classes the community is exceedingly capricious.
In one country, or in one age, of the world, a particular act may
be considered as entirely proper which in another age or country
may be wholly condemned. But a few years ago it was thought very
unladylike and improper for women to study medicine, and when
Elizabeth Blackwell forced her way into the Geneva, N. Y., medical
college people were amazed at the presumption. But she graduated
with high honors, went to Europe to perfect her studies, and now
stands high in her chosen profession. She let down the bars to
a hitherto proscribed sphere. Others followed her lead, and now
there are several colleges for the medical education of women, and
women physicians without number; and the world applauds rather than
condemns.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account