Life and writings of Amelia BloomerBloomer, D. C. (Dexter C.)
History
Life and writings of Amelia Bloomer
Bloomer, D. C. (Dexter C.)
Bloomer, Amelia Jenks, 1818-1894; Women's rights -- United States
Poor _me_ next comes in for a severe castigation from your reverend
lawgiver because I dared say that, while I supposed St. Paul’s
injunctions to women were right and proper at the time and under
the circumstances of their utterance, I did not believe they were
the rule for the educated Christian women of this enlightened day
and age, the circumstances surrounding them having greatly changed
since the introduction of Christianity. That I believed women were
no more bound by the laws and customs of that time than men were
bound to observe all the laws and customs of the same period; and
further, that the church, _by its practice_, teaches the same
thing, to a great extent. And, still further, that the words of St.
Paul had nothing to do with woman’s political rights. The reverend
gentleman puts words in my mouth I never uttered, thoughts in
my head that I never conceived, places me in a position I never
occupied and then, having attributed all manner of bad things to
me, wipes me out with a sweep of his pen. Well, I do not feel a bit
bad over all this. I have the consolation of knowing that I am in
good company, and cannot be so easily annihilated as he supposed.
There are scores of divines as able, as learned, as eloquent and
as orthodox as T. O. Rice, of Des Moines, who take the same view
of the matter as I do, and any number of good Christian people who
subscribe to the same doctrine. I ‘have no painful solicitude as
to which side will ultimately triumph.’ I am no more ‘squarely and
openly at variance with God’s Word’ than is our reverend lecturer,
who has set himself up as God’s oracle, and hopes to intimidate all
women, and strengthen the rule of all men to whom the sound of his
voice may come.
I do not question his right to think as he pleases, and lecture
women on proprieties and improprieties; but I must say, I consider
women quite as capable of judging for themselves what is proper and
what is improper for them to do as any man can be; and I think if
our reverends would turn their attention to their own sex, search
out passages and rules of conduct applicable to them, and lecture
them on their duty to their families and society, they would be
much better employed than in trying to subordinate women.
God has implanted in woman’s nature an instinctive knowledge of
what is proper and what improper for her to do, and it needs no
laws of man to teach the one or compel the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account