Life histories of North American shore birds, Part 1 (of 2)Bent, Arthur Cleveland
Science
Life histories of North American shore birds, Part 1 (of 2)
Bent, Arthur Cleveland
Birds -- Behavior; Shore birds -- North America
Invariably among the tamest and most confiding of our so-called
shore birds, they will usually permit one to approach, either on
foot or in a boat, within 5 or 6 yards, while I have known a gun to
be discharged into a flock with fatal effect, but without causing
any of the birds which escaped injury to take wing. Like most obese
creatures they are habitually sluggish, confining their wanderings
afoot to limited areas, and exploiting these very deliberately,
walking slowly and sedately in crouching attitudes, with measured
steps, frequently stopping to thrust their bills listlessly a
little way into the soft ground, or to pick up small morsels of
food from the surface. Occasionally, however, one may see them
running to and fro over the mud quite briskly and ceaselessly,
perhaps incited to this comparatively unusual behavior by the
example of other waders feeding close about them, for they are by
no means averse to the companionship of several of the lesser
kinds, such as semipalmated plover and sandpipers, grass-birds,
dunlins, etc. Although somewhat loath to take wing, even when
threatened by obvious danger, they are likely to fly swiftly and
far, when once started, doubling and circling over the marshes in
much the same manner as other small sandpipers.
John T. Nichols, says in his notes:
When startled, a bird has been seen to crouch down concealing the
bulk of its white underparts and practically disappear against the
brightly lighted mud flat on which it had been feeding. This is a
habit shared by its close relatives the pectoral and least
sandpipers.
_Voice._--The white-rumped sandpiper is ordinarily a rather silent bird,
but its short, sharp flight note is characteristic of the species and
serves to distinguish it readily in the field. To me it sounds like
_tzeep_ or _tzip_; Mr. Nichols calls it "a squeaky mouse-like _jeet_";
Mr. Brewster (1925) describes it as "a feeble lisping _zip_ or _tsip_,
fringilline, rather than limicoline, in character"; and Doctor Townsend
(1905) thinks that "it suggests at times the call note of the pipit." C.
J. Maynard (1896) refers to "one cry in particular, being loudly given
and greatly prolonged, resembling the scream of a rapacious bird more
than the whistle of a sandpiper."
_Field marks._--The best field mark for this species is the white rump,
or rather upper tail-coverts; this is conspicuous in flight but is
usually concealed by the wings when the bird is on the ground. I have
noticed that, while the bird is standing with its side toward me, the
gray of the upper parts extend down on the sides of the neck as far as
the bend of the wing, whereas in the semipalmated sandpiper, with which
it might be confused, there is a decided white space in front of the
wing.
Mr. Nichols says in his notes:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account