Life Movements in Plants, Volume IIBose, Jagadis Chandra
Science
Life Movements in Plants, Volume II
Bose, Jagadis Chandra
Growth (Plants); Plants -- Irritability and movements
[37] "This view has been the subject of a considerable amount
of controversy. Wiesner denies the localisation of geotropic
sensitiveness. Czapek, on the other hand, supports Darwin's
theory. Recently Picard has attacked the problem in a new way
(and) concludes that not only the root tip but also the
entire growing zone is capable of perceiving gravitational
stimuli.... As both Picard's experimental method and his
interpretation are open to criticism, the author has repeated
his experiments with a more satisfactory apparatus. He finds
that in _Vicia Faba_, _Phaseolus multeflorus_ and _Lupinus
albus_, both apex and growing zone are geotropically
sensitive, the former being by far the more sensitive of the
two, and the curvature of the growing zone being without a
doubt largely induced by secondary stimuli transmitted from
the apical region. Charles Darwin's views were therefore in
the main correct."--Haberlandt--_Ibid_, p. 748.
The experiments which I have described on the geo-electric response of
the root tip and of the growing region offer convincing proof of the
perception of the stimulus at the tip, and the transmission of the
effect of indirect stimulus to the growing region. These experiments
exhibit in an identical _uninjured_ organ: the excitatory reaction at
the upper side of the tip, the cessation of excitation, and the
excitation of the opposite side of the tip, following the rotation of
the organ through +90°, 0° and -90°. The effect at the growing zone is
precisely the opposite to that at the tip, _i.e._, an expansive
reaction which results from the effect of indirect stimulus, in contrast
to the contractile reaction due to direct stimulation.
We may now proceed a step further and try to obtain some idea of the
difference in the mechanics of geotropic stimulation of the shoot and of
the root, to account for the different responses in the two organs. The
reason of this difference lies in the fact that in the shoot the
perceptive and responding region is one and the same; every cut-piece of
stem exhibits the characteristic geotropic curvature. In the root the
case is different; for the removal of the sensitive root-tip reduces or
abolishes the geotropic action; the region of maximum geotropic
perception is thus separated from that of response. It must be borne in
mind _that this holds good only in the case of gravitational stimulus_,
for the decapitated root still continues to respond to other forms of
stimulation such as chemical or photic.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account