Life Movements in Plants, Volume IIBose, Jagadis Chandra
Science
Life Movements in Plants, Volume II
Bose, Jagadis Chandra
Growth (Plants); Plants -- Irritability and movements
The stimulus of gravity is perceived at the root-tip; it is the effect
of indirect stimulus that is transmitted to the responding region of
growth.
In contrast with the above is the fact that the growing region of the
shoot is both sensitive and responsive to geotropic stimulus.
As the effects of direct and indirect stimulation on growth are
antithetic, the responses of shoot and root to the direct and indirect
stimulus must be of opposite signs.
There is no necessity for postulating two different irritabilities for
the shoot and the root, since tissues in general exhibit positive or
negative curvatures according as the stimulus is direct or indirect.
XLIII.--LOCALISATION OF GEO-PERCEPTIVE LAYER BY MEANS OF THE ELECTRIC
PROBE
_By_
SIR J. C. BOSE,
_Assisted by_
SATYENDRA CHANDRA GUHA.
The obscurities which surround the phenomenon of geotropism arise: (1)
from the invisibility of the stimulating agent, (2) from want of
definite knowledge as to whether the fundamental reaction is contractile
or expansive, and (3) from the peculiar characteristic that the stimulus
is only effective when the _external_ force of gravity reacts
_internally_ through the mass of contents of the sensitive cells.
The experiments that have been detailed in the foregoing chapters will
have removed most of the difficulties. But beyond these is the question
of that power possessed by plants of _perceiving_ geotropic stimulus by
means of certain localised sense organs, which send out impulses in
response to which neighbouring cells carry out the movement of
orientation in a definite direction. Are the sensitive cells diffusely
distributed in the organ or do they form a definite layer? Could we by
the well established method of physiological response localise the
sensitive cells in the interior of the organ? As the internal cells are
not accessible, the problem would appear to be beyond the reach of
experimental investigation.
It is true that post-mortem examination of sectioned tissues under the
microscope enables us to form a probable hypothesis as regards the
contents of certain cells causing geotropic irritation; we have thus the
very illuminating theory of statoliths propounded by Noll, Haberlandt
and Nemec. But for the clear understanding of the _physiological
reaction_ which induces the orientating movement, it is necessary to get
hold, as it were, of a single or a group of sensory cells _in situ_ and
in a condition of fullest vital activity; to detect and follow by some
subtle means the change induced in the perceptive organ and the
irradiation of excitation to neighbouring cells, through the entire
cycles of reaction, from the onset of geotropic stimulus to its
cessation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account