Life of Charles DarwinBettany, G. T. (George Thomas)
Science
Life of Charles Darwin
Bettany, G. T. (George Thomas)
Darwin, Charles, 1809-1882
"What improvements in medical practice may be directly attributed
to physiological research is a question which can be properly
discussed only by those physiologists and medical practitioners who
have studied the history of their subjects; but, as far as I can
learn, the benefits are already great. However this may be, no one,
unless he is grossly ignorant of what science has done for mankind,
can entertain any doubt of the incalculable benefits which will
hereafter be derived from physiology, not only by man, but by the
lower animals. Look, for instance, at Pasteur's results of
modifying the germs of the most malignant diseases, from which, as
it so happens, animals will, in the first place, receive more
relief than man. Let it be remembered how many lives, and what a
fearful amount of suffering have been saved by the knowledge gained
of parasitic worms through the experiments of Virchow and others on
living animals. In the future every one will be astonished at the
ingratitude shown, at least in England, to these benefactors of
mankind. As for myself, permit me to assure you that I honour, and
shall always honour, every one who advances the noble science of
physiology.
"Dear sir, yours faithfully,
"CHARLES DARWIN."
As an experimenter Darwin was by no means overconfident either in his
methods or his power of obtaining results. He simply took the best means
open to him, or that he could devise, applied them in the best way known
to him, and calmly studied the result. "As far as my experience goes,"
he wrote, in reference to experimental work, "what one expects rarely
happens." On another occasion, after working like a slave at a certain
investigation, "with very poor success;" he remarks, "as usual, almost
everything goes differently to what I had anticipated." How few
investigators have the magnanimity which appears in this confession. But
more than this, it is an indication of the rare patience with which he
stuck at a subject till he knew all he could read or discover or develop
in connection with it. It was "dogged" that did it; "awfully hard work"
sometimes. In reference to an attempt of his to define intelligence,
which he regarded as unsatisfactory, after remarking that he tried to
observe what passed in his own mind when he did the work of a worm, he
writes: "If I come across a professed metaphysician, I will ask him to
give me a more technical definition with a few big words, about the
abstract, the concrete, the absolute, and the infinite. But sincerely, I
should be grateful for any suggestions; for it will hardly do to assume
that every fool knows what 'intelligent' means."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account