Life of Father Ignatius of St. Paul, Passionist (The Hon. & Rev. George Spencer).Pius a Sp. Sancto (Pius a Spiritu Sancto)
Religion
Life of Father Ignatius of St. Paul, Passionist (The Hon. & Rev. George Spencer).
Pius a Sp. Sancto (Pius a Spiritu Sancto)
Passionists; Spencer, George, 1799-1864
"After much reflection I must confess to you their system appears
reasonable, natural, and convincing. With us, they consider the Holy
Scriptures as the most respectable testimony of our faith, and they
profess a strict adherence to them; they have for them the greatest
respect; and the Catholic priests support from the Bible what they
{178} teach the people, and I am certain that they study and
understand the Scriptures as much as our ministers. The principal
difference I remark is, that they do not undertake to interpret them
according to their own opinions: they say that the inspired writings
are replete with mysteries, which the eye of man cannot penetrate;
and that He alone who gave them is able to comprehend their
sublimity; consequently, to follow the impulse of reason in
explaining them, would be incurring the danger of falling into
error, and leading others into the same path. For this cause the
Catholic minister will not suffer the Holy Scriptures to be
separated from the instruction of their predecessors up to the
Apostles; not that they by any means give the word of man precedence
to the Word of God, since they believe that man alone cannot explain
it, for 'who,' they ask, 'assisted at the council of the Almighty?'
But they believe that those who heard the Apostles preach,
understood the true meaning of their words; and that their immediate
successors, _especially_, educated by them, and who taught the
Gospel during the life of their instructors, necessarily understood
the meaning of their writings, the doctrine of which was undoubtedly
conformable to what they taught verbally. ...."
"St. Paul, in his Epistles to the Colossians, informs us that the
Gospel was preached to all the world. This being the case, I see no
possibility of introducing any new doctrine. The Apostles threatened
with eternal punishment those who did not believe what they taught
in the name of Jesus Christ. And whoever would have the temerity to
add to the primitive doctrine they visited with a like anathema.
Tell me, now, how could the Church have introduced such a doctrine
as that of the Real Presence, after a priest has pronounced the
words, "This is my body"? How is it possible that the faithful could
reconcile themselves to the idea of acknowledging and adoring Jesus
Christ present on the altar, as He was in the manger at Bethlehem,
and as He is in Heaven at the right hand of His Father, if this
doctrine had not always been received and believed as it is at
present by the Roman Catholic Church? {179} Christians who knew the
value of salvation could not so easily be deceived; several among
them would have remonstrated against this superstition and idolatry.
Do we find that they have done so?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account