Life of Frederick Courtenay Selous, D.S.O., Capt. 25th Royal FusiliersMillais, John Guille
Philosophy
Life of Frederick Courtenay Selous, D.S.O., Capt. 25th Royal Fusiliers
Millais, John Guille
Selous, Frederick Courteney, 1851-1917; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Africa
This was also exactly my own experience as recently as 1893, when I
lived entirely and trekked with Boers for a year. Never was I ever
treated except with the greatest kindness both by my own intimate
friends or casual acquaintances, once I had learnt to speak the "Taal,"
nor did I ever hear them "crow" over their victories of 1881. There was,
however, always the latent fear that the British Government would again
play them false, and they would be once more forced to fight us; but
with individual Englishmen they liked and trusted there was no sign of
animosity.[52]
In June, 1900, Selous was asked to sign a protest, issued by the "South
Africa Conciliation Committee," inaugurated by W. L. Courtney (editor of
the "Fortnightly Review"). In the following letter, however, written to
the Secretary, he manifests his sound common-sense in separating the
"causes of the war" from what could be done at the moment when our
forces were actually fighting and likely to prove victorious. His
grievance was with the authorities who brought about the war and the
methods which had been employed to make it, and not with the conduct
thereof or its natural effects. Wherefore he refused to sign the
protest, and gave his reasons as follows:--
"_August 3rd, 1900._
"I have left your circular so long unanswered because I have
been thinking over it very deeply, and because, although I
realize most fully the force of all the arguments that can be
used against the annexation of the Boer Republics, I still think
that those who sign the protest ought to be able to propose some
scheme of settlement which holds out a better prospect of future
peace. I personally can think of no such scheme. Had honourable
terms been offered to the Boers, and the independence of their
countries been assured to them with certain necessary
limitations, immediately after the occupation of Pretoria, there
might have been great hope for the future peace of the country,
but all that has occurred, not only in the Transvaal and Orange
State, but also in the Cape Colony, must have caused such a
feeling of exasperation amongst the Dutch Africanders against
the British Government, that I cannot but feel that the granting
of a limited independence to the Boer Republics would not now
produce rest or peace. Things have gone too far for that now,
and it seems to me that Great Britain will only be able to hold
South Africa in the immediate future by force. I am of course
convinced of the truth of all you say in the protest, that the
annexation of the Boer Republics is 'contrary to the public
declarations of Her Majesty's Ministers, alien to all the best
traditions of a freedom-loving country, burdensome to the
resources of the nation, and wholly distasteful to the majority
of our fellow-subjects in South Africa,' but that does not blind
me to the fact that the race hatred that has been engendered by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account