Life of George Washington, volume 2 of 5Irving, Washington
History
Life of George Washington, volume 2 of 5
Irving, Washington
Presidents -- United States -- Biography; Washington, George, 1732-1799
Washington speaks of them as being for the most part, if not all, men of
reputation and property. They were, in fact, mostly farmers. As to their
sorry _jades_, they were rough country horses, such as farmers keep, not
for show, but service. As to their dingy regimentals, we quote a word in
their favor from a writer of that day. “Some of these worthy soldiers
assisted in their present uniforms at the reduction of Louisburg, and
their ’lank checks and war-worn coats,’ are viewed with more veneration
by their honest countrymen, than if they were glittering nabobs from
India, or bashaws with nine tails.”[84]
On arriving, their horses, from scarcity of forage, had to be pastured
about King’s Bridge. In fact, Washington informed them that, under
present circumstances, they could not be of use as horsemen; on which
they concluded to stay, and do duty on foot till the arrival of the new
levies.[85] In a letter to Governor Trumbull (July 11), Washington
observes: “The officers and men of that corps have manifested so firm an
attachment to the cause we are engaged in, that they have consented to
remain here, till such a body of troops are marched from your colony as
will be a sufficient reinforcement, so as to admit of their leaving this
city with safety. * * * * They have the additional merit of determining
to stay, even if they are obliged to maintain their horses at their own
expense.”[86]
In a very few days, however, the troopers, on being requested to mount
guard like other soldiers, grew restless and uneasy. Colonel Seymour and
his brother field-officers, therefore, addressed a note to Washington,
stating that, by the positive laws of Connecticut, the light-horse were
expressly exempted from staying in garrison, or doing duty on foot,
apart from their horses; and that they found it impossible to detain
their men any longer under that idea, they having come “without the
least expectation or preparation for such services.” They respectfully,
therefore, asked a dismission in form. Washington’s brief reply, shows
that he was nettled by their conduct.
“Gentlemen: In answer to yours of this date, I can only repeat to you
what I said last night, and that is, that if your men think themselves
exempt from the common duty of a soldier—will not mount guard, do
garrison duty, or service separate from their horses—they can no longer
be of any use here, where horses cannot be brought to action, and I do
not care how soon they are dismissed.”
In fact, the assistance of these troops was much needed; yet he
apprehended the exemption from fatigue and garrison duty which they
demanded as a right, would, if granted, set a dangerous example to
others, and be productive of many evil consequences.
In the hurry of various concerns he directed his aide-de-camp, Colonel
Webb, to write in his name to Governor Trumbull on the subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account