Life of George Washington, volume 2 of 5Irving, Washington
History
Life of George Washington, volume 2 of 5
Irving, Washington
Presidents -- United States -- Biography; Washington, George, 1732-1799
The encounter thus detailed was a small affair in itself, but important
in its effects. It was the first gleam of success in the campaign, and
revived the spirits of the army. Washington sought to turn it to the
greatest advantage. In his general orders, he skilfully distributed
praise and censure. The troops under Leitch were thanked for being the
first to advance upon the enemy; and the New England troops for
gallantly supporting them, and their conduct was honorably contrasted
with that of the recreant troops at Kip’s Bay. Of Knowlton, who had
fallen while gloriously fighting, he spoke as “one who would have done
honor to any country.”
The name of Leitch was given by him for the next day’s parole. That
brave officer died of his wounds on the 1st of October, soothed in his
last moments by that recompense so dear to a soldier’s heart, the
encomium of a beloved commander.
In the dead of the night, on the 20th September, a great light was
beheld by the picket guards, looming up from behind the hills in the
direction of the city. It continued throughout the night, and was at
times so strong that the heavens in that direction appeared to them,
they said, as if in flames. At daybreak huge columns of smoke were still
rising. It was evident there had been a great conflagration in New York.
In the course of the morning Captain Montresor, aide-de-camp to General
Howe, came out with a flag, bearing a letter to Washington on the
subject of an exchange of prisoners. According to Montresor’s account a
great part of the city had been burnt down, and as the night was
extremely windy, the whole might have been so, but for the exertions of
the officers and men of the British army. He implied it to be the act of
American incendiaries, several of whom, he informed Colonel Reed, had
been caught in the fact and instantly shot. General Howe, in his private
correspondence, makes the same assertion, and says they were detected,
and killed on the spot by the enraged troops in garrison.
Enraged troops, with weapons in their hands, are not apt, in a time of
confusion and alarm, to be correct judges of fact, or dispensers of
justice. The act was always disclaimed by the Americans, and it is
certain their commanders knew nothing bout it. We have shown that the
destruction of the city was at one time discussed in a council of war as
a measure of policy, but never adopted, and was expressly forbidden by
Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account