Life of James Buchanan, Fifteenth President of the United States. v. 2 (of 2)Curtis, George Ticknor
History
Life of James Buchanan, Fifteenth President of the United States. v. 2 (of 2)
Curtis, George Ticknor
Buchanan, James, 1791-1868
“In my message to the House of Representatives of the 28th March
last, I solemnly protested against the creation of a committee, at
the head of which was placed my accuser, for the purpose of
investigating whether the President had, ‘by money, patronage or
other improper means, sought to influence the action of Congress,
or any committee thereof, for or against the passage of any law
appertaining to the rights of any State or Territory.’ I protested
against this because it was destitute of any specification;
because it referred to no particular act to enable the President
to prepare for his defence; because it deprived him of the
constitutional guards, which, in common with every citizen of the
United States, he possesses for his protection; and because it
assailed his constitutional independence as a coördinate branch of
the Government. There is an enlightened justice, as well as a
beautiful symmetry, in every part of the Constitution. This is
conspicuously manifested in regard to impeachments. The House of
Representatives possesses ‘the sole power of impeachment;’ the
Senate ‘the sole power to try all impeachments;’ and the
impeachable offences are ‘treason, bribery, or other high crimes
or misdemeanors.’ The practice of the House, from the earliest
times, had been in accordance with its own dignity, the rights of
the accused, and the demands of justice. At the commencement of
each judicial investigation which might lead to an impeachment,
specific charges were always preferred; the accused had an
opportunity of cross-examining the witnesses, and he was placed in
full possession of the precise nature of the offence which he had
to meet. An impartial and elevated standing committee was charged
with this investigation, upon which no member inspired with the
ancient sense of honor and justice would have served, had he ever
expressed an opinion against the accused. Until the present
occasion, it was never deemed proper to transform the accuser into
the judge, and to confer upon him the selection of his own
committee.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account