Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 5: With His Letters and JournalsMoore, Thomas
General
Life of Lord Byron, Vol. 5: With His Letters and Journals
Moore, Thomas
Byron, George Gordon Byron, Baron, 1788-1824; Poets, English -- 19th century -- Biography
"By the last post I sent you 'The Irish Avatar,'--what think you?
The last line--'a name never spoke but with curses or jeers'--must
run either 'a name only uttered with curses or jeers,' or, 'a
wretch never named but with curses or jeers.' Be_case_ as _how_,
'spoke' is not grammar, except in the House of Commons; and I doubt
whether we can say 'a name _spoken_,' for _mentioned_. I have some
doubts, too, about 'repay,'--'and for murder repay with a shout and
a smile.' Should it not be, 'and for murder repay him with shouts
and a smile, 'or '_reward_ him with shouts and a smile?'
"So, pray put your poetical pen through the MS. and take the least
bad of the emendations. Also, if there be any further breaking of
Priscian's head, will you apply a plaster? I wrote in the greatest
hurry and fury, and sent it to you the day after; so, doubtless,
there will be some awful constructions, and a rather lawless
conscription of rhythmus.
"With respect to what Anna Seward calls 'the liberty of
transcript,'--when complaining of Miss Matilda Muggleton, the
accomplished daughter of a choral vicar of Worcester Cathedral, who
had abused the said 'liberty of transcript,' by inserting in the
Malvern Mercury Miss Seward's 'Elegy on the South Pole,' as her
_own_ production, with her _own_ signature, two years after having
taken a copy, by permission of the authoress--with regard, I say,
to the 'liberty of transcript,' I by no means oppose an occasional
copy to the benevolent few, provided it does not degenerate into
such licentiousness of Verb and Noun as may tend to 'disparage my
parts of speech' by the carelessness of the transcribblers.
"I do not think that there is much danger of the 'King's Press
being abused' upon the occasion, if the publishers of journals have
any regard for their remaining liberty of person. It is as pretty a
piece of invective as ever put publisher in the way to 'Botany.'
Therefore, if _they_ meddle with it, it is at _their_ peril. As for
myself, I will answer any jontleman--though I by no means recognise
a 'right of search' into an unpublished production and unavowed
poem. The same applies to things published _sans_ consent. I hope
you like, at least, the concluding lines of the _Pome_?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account