[232] See in further corroboration of the facts stated above, a Letter of Archibald Douglas to the Queen of Scots, in Robertson's Appendix, or in Laing, vol. ii. p. 363. [233] "Nec ullam hac in causa reginæ accusationem intervenire."--See the King of Denmark's Letter in Laing, vol. ii. p. 328. [234] Goodall, vol. ii. p. 382. [235] Keith, Appendix, p. 141. [236] Jebb, vol. ii. p. 227.--Keith, Appendix, p. 143. [237] See the New Monthly Magazine, No. LIV. p. 521. [238] Lesley's "Defence" in Anderson, vol. i. p. 40. [239] Miss Benger, Appendix, vol. ii. p. 494. [240] Buchanan, book xix.--Stuart, vol. i. p. 460. [241] Robertson, Appendix to vol. i. No. xxii. [242] Anderson, vol. iv. Part I. p. 120 and 125. [243] Keith, Appendix, p. 145. [244] Jebb, vol. ii. p. 671. [245] Anderson, vol. ii. p. 185. [246] Anderson, ibid. p. 187.--Laing, vol. ii. p. 296. [247] Laing, Appendix p. 323. [248] Laing, vol. ii. p. 298. [249] Ibid. p. 300. [250] Tytler, vol. i. p. 20. [251] It is unnecessary to enter into any discussion regarding the second Confession of Paris, which has been so satisfactorily proved to be spurious, by Tytler, Whittaker, and Chalmers, and on which Robertson acknowledges "no stress is to be laid," on account of the "improbable circumstances" it contains. See Tytler, vol. i. p. 286.--Whittaker, vol. ii. p. 305.--Chalmers, vol. ii. p. 50.--Robertson, vol. iii. p. 20. [252] Robertson, vol. iii. p. 21. [253] Goodall, vol. ii. p. 371 and 375.--Robertson, vol. iii. p. 28. [254] The French edition of the Detection, p. 2.--Goodall, vol. i. p. 103. [255] Goodall, vol. ii. p. 235. [256] Laing, vol. i. p. 250.