Life of Napoleon Bonaparte, Volume III.Scott, Walter
History
Life of Napoleon Bonaparte, Volume III.
Scott, Walter
France -- History -- 1789-1815; Napoleon I, Emperor of the French, 1769-1821
"Men are we, and must grieve even when the shade
Of that which once was great is pass'd away."
WORDSWORTH.--S.
CHAPTER XXXV.
_Ungenerous conduct of Buonaparte to the Duke of Brunswick--The
approach of the French troops to Brunswick compels the dying Prince
to cause himself to be carried to Altona, where he expires--Oath of
revenge taken by his Son--At Potsdam and Berlin, the proceedings of
Napoleon are equally cruel and vindictive--His clemency towards the
Prince of Hatzfeld--His Treatment of the Lesser Powers--Jerome
Buonaparte--Seizure of Hamburgh--Berlin Decrees against British
Commerce--Napoleon rejects all application from the continental
commercial towns to relax or repeal them--Commerce, nevertheless,
flourishes in spite of them--Second anticipation called for of the
Conscription for 1807--The King of Prussia applies for an
Armistice, which is clogged with such harsh terms, that he refuses
them._
The will of Napoleon seemed now the only law, from which the conquered
country, that so late stood forth as the rival of France, was to expect
her destiny; and circumstances indicated, that, with more than the
fortune of Cæsar or Alexander, the Conqueror would not emulate their
generosity or clemency.
[Sidenote: THE DUKE OF BRUNSWICK.]
The treatment of the ill-fated Duke of Brunswick did little honour to
the victor. After receiving a mortal wound on the field of battle, he
was transported from thence to Altona. Upon his way to his native
dominions, in the government of which his conduct had been always
patriotic and praiseworthy, he wrote to Napoleon, representing that,
although he had fought against him as a general in the Prussian service,
he nevertheless, as a Prince of the Empire, recommended his hereditary
principality to the moderation and clemency of the victor. This attempt
to separate his two characters, or to appeal to the immunities of a
league which Napoleon had dissolved, although natural in the duke's
forlorn situation, formed a plea not likely to be attended to by the
conqueror. But, on other and broader grounds, Buonaparte, if not
influenced by personal animosity against the duke, or desirous to
degrade, in his person, the father-in-law of the heir of the British
crown, might have found reasons for treating the defeated general with
the respect due to his rank and his misfortunes. The Duke of Brunswick
was one of the oldest soldiers in Europe, and his unquestioned bravery
ought to have recommended him to his junior in arms. He was a reigning
prince, and Buonaparte's own aspirations towards confirmation of
aristocratical rank should have led him to treat the vanquished with
decency. Above all, the duke was defenceless, wounded, dying; a
situation to command the sympathy of every military man, who knows on
what casual circumstances the fate of battle depends. The answer of
Napoleon was, nevertheless, harsh and insulting in the last degree. He
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account