To compare the Trevithick high-pressure steam pumping engine, with the Watt low-pressure steam pumping engine, take one of the largest of the latter, made about that time, say, with an 80-inch cylinder, which commenced its down-stroke with steam of, say, 3 lbs. on the inch, acting on the 5000 square inches of the piston, which steam at the finish of the stroke--the writer is describing the usage at that time, for Watt himself advocated a less steam pressure--was reduced by expansion to, say, 1 lb., giving an average steam pressure of, say, 2 lbs. on the top of the piston, whose under side was in vacuum equal to 14 lbs. on the inch, reduced by, say, one-third loss in working the air-pump to 9 lbs., which power, from vacuum added to the 2 lbs. from steam, gives a net force of 11 lbs. on each square inch of the piston. As the Watt pumping engine moved in equilibrium during its up-stroke, it thereby gained no increase of power; its compound stroke was therefore a force of 11 lbs. on each square inch, which, multiplied by the area of the piston, gives a net force of 55,000 lbs. The practical comparison therefore stands,--Trevithick's 16-inch pole high-pressure steam, and vacuum, on each inch 64 lbs., net force 7808 lbs.; Trevithick's 33-inch pole high-pressure steam, without vacuum, on each inch 112 lbs., net force 95,760 lbs.; Watt's 80-inch piston, low-pressure steam, and vacuum, on each inch 11 lbs., net force 55,000 lbs. As the first cost was mainly dependent on the size, the Trevithick engine was commercially much more valuable than the Watt engine. "I saw Captain Trevithick's puffer working at the Herland Mine. The steam used to blow off like blue fire--it was so strong. The lever on the safety-valve was about 3 feet long, with a great weight on it, more than a hundredweight. The engine did not answer very well, for the packing in the pole stuffing box used to burn out, and a cloud of steam escaped. The greatest difficulty was in the leaking of the boilers. You could hardly go near them. Before that time we always put rope-yarn between the lap of the boiler-plates to make the seams tight. Captain Dick's high-pressure steam burnt it all out. He said, 'Now you shall never make another boiler for me with rope-yarn.' Everybody said it was impossible to make a tight boiler without it. We put barrowfuls of horse-dung and bran in Captain Dick's boilers to stop the leaks."[29] [Footnote 29: Henry Clark of Redruth, in 1869, aged eighty-three years.]