W. Thou seest a change in nature. Thou seest not the change which
nature produces, until it is produced. The wisdom of God in nature
works great changes. The blossom is not as the fruit, nor the seed as
the blossom. The voice which nature utters, is a voice thou wilt not
deny. It is the voice of God to thee. Dost thou hear it, and dost thou
feel it? The young ravens cry, and their cry is heard. The wail of want
finds a response in the supply which sympathy affords. That sympathy is
natural; and, in its exercise, the unfledged wing becomes invigorated,
and change gives support to the dependent. So, in thy weakness, thou
hast received aid from sympathy, until change gave thee strength to aid
others. Sympathy is the divinity of nature. It controls even animals.
It will control enemies. It is a divinity that no enemy can resist. It
will conquer. It will change the old into new. The barren field will
become the fruitful vineyard. The dormant energies will be quickened.
The inactive powers will become active, and change will make all things
new.
M. If all things become changed by progress, will not all things lose
their original identity?
W. The change is not external, but is internal. The change is pure. The
grossness of impurity, being removed, allows a work of refinement to
take place, so that the divinity of sympathy may be exercised without
obstruction. In its progress, the refinement will expand the charity
of the soul, and divest it of all wrong. When it is divested of all
wrong, it will feel inspired with benevolence. This benevolence will
become extended, until all nature smiles with the love of God, and all
minds are linked together forming a chain of affinity co-extensive with
the whole world, in heaven and on earth, and united by an immortal tie
which no change will dissolve, but strengthen, forever and ever.
On arriving at the designated place, there were many minds conversing
about the motives of works. One said, that no motive could be pure,
unless a mind realized some good to itself; another said, all good of
self should be overlooked; and a third said, no mind could overlook the
good of itself. We heard the conversation, when William asked, “How can
self be overlooked, when self is a part of the body, of which all are
members?”
“Ought not selfishness to be overcome, so that others’ good may be
advanced?” said a mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account