W. There will be this lesson first taught, which makes nothing wrong
which is adapted to the good of the individual and others, and which
injures no one. The next lesson will be repeated, when mind has wisdom
to adopt the first; but we are not willing to make a development
thereof, until conditions shall require it. Indeed, conditions would
seem to forbid it, because of its want of harmony. Adaptation is
harmony with good, for whatever is harmonious can not be injurious.
The mind, acting in harmony with its own wants, and unrestrained by
conditions, will not be dissatisfied but happy in its sphere. The mind,
which acts as it does not see right and proper, must act as conflicting
conditions make it; and, while acting as conditions compel, it must
be dissatisfied and unhappy. Dissatisfaction is unhappiness. Minds in
this sphere, are adapted to the conditions around them. The circles
have what they want. There is no inharmony between their wants and the
means to gratify them. The low want what they have, and they have what
they want. It is even so with all circles; but all circles have not
the same wants. While the low want what will satisfy their condition,
the high want what will satisfy their condition. The wisdom which
is satisfactory to the low, would be very unsatisfactory to minds
above them. Hence, they will say, they are happy; and they say truly,
because, in their ignorance, they want no more. But mind, elevated in
wisdom above them, would not be happy with what they have. Thus, wisdom
is not unsatisfactory to any mind, and the only difference is the
degree to which each has attained.
Societies and churches on earth have their degrees of wisdom. What
is satisfactory to one would not be to another. Now, if one society
were to compel the other to adopt its wisdom, a disturbance would
necessarily ensue which would be very likely to make both unhappy.
It is not, therefore, just on the part of one to compel the other to
adopt its creed or form of worship. Such compulsion would be fatal to
the enjoyment of both. It would introduce a conflict and beget a war,
that would disturb their happiness. Both parties would suffer by it.
Hence, all coercive measures, calculated to make minds hypocrites,
and introduce conflicting minds into one society, are irrational and
unjust; and they who succeed in doing such work, violate the harmony of
nature’s laws, and will receive their just reward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account