Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
"Mesdames, I repeat, it is impossible. If one of my assistants likes to
take you in hand, well and good. That is all I can do for you."
Then, turning round, she perceives a stout lady who looks imploringly at
her, and declares brusquely, "Ah, madame, I have already told you that I
cannot undertake to dress you. You are not my style. I do not understand
plump women."
"But, Madame Rodrigues--"
"If one of my _premières_ cares to take you in hand, I have no
objection; but that is all I can do for you."
The only thing that calms the great artist is the arrival of one of her
favorite actresses.
"Ah, _bonjour_, Madame Judic: you will have your toilets on Friday--"
"But the first performance is announced for Wednesday."
"They must put it off, then, for I am not ready. We will try your dress
for the second act this afternoon." And the _grande couturière_ settles
herself in her arm-chair, calls for her footstool, her fan, her cup of
beef-tea, her smelling-salts, and so proceeds to preside over the
terrible and imposing ceremony of trying on the dress of a fashionable
actress.
Doubtless the luxury of the Parisiennes is not so great now as it was
under the Empire; but the falling off in the home trade is partly
compensated by the increase in the foreign customers. In Paris alone
the dress-making trade represents the movement of fifty millions of
dollars a year and gives employment to some fifty thousand women; and
many of the elegant society women spend from twenty to thirty thousand
dollars a year on their costume and toilet. But it must not be believed
that the modern _couturier_ is the first who has known how to draw up
big bills, or that the modern _lingère_ is the first who has dared to
charge two hundred dollars for a chemise and half as much for a
pocket-handkerchief. Dress has always reigned supreme in France at
least. Louis XVI. has been guillotined, Napoleon I. exiled, Charles X.
dismissed, Louis Philippe and Napoleon III. replaced without their leave
by a new form of government. But dress has never been dethroned; and,
just as in our own days Dupin thundered in the Senate against the
desperate luxury of the Parisiennes of the Empire, so in the eighteenth
century old Sebastien Mercier lamented that the fear of the milliners'
bills prevented young men from marrying, and so left fifteen hundred
thousand girls without husbands! The great dress-makers of those days
were Madame Eloffe, the artist who dressed Marie Antoinette, and whose
account-books have recently been published; with notes and curious
colored plates, by the Comte de Reiset, and Madame Cafaxe, the
_modiste-couturière_ of the Fauburg St.-Honoré, celebrated for her
exorbitant charges. One has only to consult the curious historical
researches of the brothers De Goncourt in order to appreciate the luxury
and extravagance of the past century. Imagine that in the
wedding-trousseau of Mademoiselle Lepelletier Saint-Fargeau there
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account