Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
There are literary evolutionists who, in their whim of seeing in every
original writer a copy of some predecessor, have declared that Hawthorne
is derived from Tieck, and Poe from Hoffmann, just as Dickens modelled
himself on Smollett and Thackeray followed in the footsteps of Fielding.
In all four cases the pupil surpassed the master,--if haply Tieck and
Hoffmann can be considered as even remotely the masters of Hawthorne and
Poe. When Coleridge was told that Klopstock was the German Milton, he
assented with the dry addendum, "A very German Milton." So is Hoffmann a
very German Poe, and Tieck a very German Hawthorne. Of a truth, both Poe
and Hawthorne are as American as any one can be. If the adjective
American has any meaning at all, it qualifies Poe and Hawthorne. They
were American to the core. They both revealed the curious sympathy with
Oriental moods of thought which is often an American characteristic,
Poe, with his cold logic and his mathematical analysis, and Hawthorne,
with his introspective conscience and his love of the subtile and the
invisible, are representative of phases of American character not to be
mistaken by any one who has given thought to the influence of
nationality.
As to which of the two was the greater, discussion is idle, but that
Hawthorne was the finer genius few would deny. Poe, as cunning an
artificer of goldsmith's work and as adroit in its vending as was ever
M. Josse, declared that "Hawthorne's distinctive trait is invention,
creation, imagination, originality,--a trait which in the literature of
fiction is positively worth all the rest." But the moral basis of
Hawthorne's work, which had flowered in the crevices and crannies of
New-England Puritanism, Poe did not concern himself with. In Poe's hands
the story of "The Ambitious Guest" might have thrilled us with a more
powerful horror, but it would have lacked the ethical beauty which
Hawthorne gave it and which makes it significant beyond a mere feat of
verbal legerdemain. And the subtile simplicity of "The Great Stone Face"
is as far from Poe as the pathetic irony of "The Ambitious Guest." In
all his most daring fantasies Hawthorne is natural, and, though he may
project his vision far beyond the boundaries of fact, nowhere does he
violate the laws of nature. He had at all times a wholesome simplicity,
and he never showed any trace of the morbid taint which characterizes
nearly all Poe's work. Hawthorne, one may venture to say, had the broad
sanity of genius, while we should understand any one who might declare
that Poe had mental disease raised to the _n'th_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account