Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Vol. 22, November, 1878Various
History
Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Vol. 22, November, 1878
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
Before quitting the labyrinth of French art we must not forget a class
of painters who have received a great deal of admiration, and who
deserve it, whatever rank one may be disposed to assign to their special
branch of art. I refer to the painters of still-life. There is Vollon,
for instance, whose name suggests those wonderful representations of
armor, of rich goldsmith's work, superb tapestries and damascened metal,
to say nothing of the equally admirable counterfeits of warming-pans and
saucepans, which delight the lover of _nature-morte_. We find here his
famous kettle of red copper, sold at a price which might suggest that it
was of solid gold. Amateurs and dealers pronounce Vollon the first of
painters in his specialty, though there are some who profess a
preference for his rival, Blaise-Desgoffes, of whom there are three
examples in the Exposition; and though these are only Venetian glass,
Gothic missals, jewel-boxes and the like, there are some of them worth
thirty thousand francs at the very least: it will be understood that I
speak of the paintings, and not of what they represent. Philippe
Rousseau displays not less than a dozen pictures, and the names of
their owners, Alexandre Dumas, the baroness de Rothschild, Barbedienne,
Édouard Dubufe, etc., show how much he is the _mode_. Indeed, it is
impossible to imagine cheeses more savory, fresher oysters, peaches and
vegetables more inviting, and flowers--I had almost said more fragrant,
so perfect is the illusion of reality.
But we must tear ourselves from these fascinating galleries, for should
we write for ever we shall always be sure to forget some celebrity who
deserves to be mentioned. We have said nothing of the scenes from
fashionable life; nor of the dogs and horses which MM. Claude and J.
Lewis Brown render so capitally; nor of the portraits of Pérignon,
Édouard Dubufe and Cot; nor of the flowers of Mademoiselle Escallier.
Three great names, Jules Dupré, Rosa Bonheur and Puvis de Chavannes, are
absent--one knows not why.
Belgium is next in order--thrifty Belgium, where painting is a
commercial industry and its products an important article of
exportation. The Belgian display in the Champ de Mars is certainly a
considerable one in point of numbers, which will not surprise us when we
remember that there are at least twelve art-schools in the country--to
say nothing of the great academies of Brussels and Antwerp--where
hundreds of young men are daily drilled in the grammar and technique of
art. But genius is the gift of Nature, not of schools. All that the
latter can bestow is probably here, but we miss the imagination, the
variety, the sentiment of the born artist, and it needs no very critical
examination of these paintings to show us that the acquired dexterity of
the academy, the mere _business_ of the painter, is almost the only
characteristic of the Belgian school.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account