Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Vol. 26, November, 1880Various
History
Lippincott's Magazine of Popular Literature and Science, Vol. 26, November, 1880
Various
Literature, Modern -- 19th century -- Periodicals; Science -- Periodicals
Having studied the spinal marrow, the physiologist, leaving this
untouched, cuts off the upper brain of the frog, leaving the lower
brain in union with the spinal cord, and unharmed. A frog so mutilated,
sitting upon a leaf or tuft of grass in a swamp, would be apt to be
passed unnoticed as anything extraordinary. He sits perfectly still
when approached, but touch him and he leaps off vigorously. If an
obstacle be in the way, he does not strike it, but springs above,
below or to one side as circumstances may favor. If dropped into
the water, he swims as well as ever, and if the water be gradually
heated, he soon endeavors to get out. If, as he sits upon a board, the
latter be quietly and not too suddenly moved, he does not jump away,
but continually shifts his position, so as to maintain the centre of
gravity in its proper place and to keep the normal erect posture.
Stroke the back of the frog gently and he croaks responsively, as if
the titillation called back pleasant memories of caresses received in
some lover's tussock-bower. The answer to the stroking is so certain
that, as suggested by Goltz, a chorus of brainless frogs might be
obtained whose batrachian voices would delight the nerves of old
Aristophanes with a triumphal burst of _Brekekekéx! koáx! koáx!_
Many other things will the brained frog do--almost enough to convince
a superficial observer that the cerebral hemispheres are a luxurious
superfluity to the physical and mental well-being of the average
inhabitant of the swamp. But no. A little watching shows that for
this seemingly intelligent creature past, present and future are
alike blotted out. Let the frog alone and it sits motionless, buried
not in the profundity of its thoughts, but in the abyss of its
thoughtlessness. In the midst of abundance it starves--not, like
Tantalus, because it cannot gratify its desires, but because it has no
desires to gratify. It feels no hunger, or if it feels hunger seeks
no food. A perfect automaton, it moves when touched, it croaks when
stroked, it answers to a multitude of external irritations, but when
untouched and left to itself it is as a lifeless clod until the sun
dries it up and the winds blow it away.
The fish whose cerebral hemispheres or upper brain has been taken away
has, like the frog, all conscious perception blotted out, but, unlike
the frog, it is in perpetual motion. Stopping not for food, it rushes
through the water, avoiding obstacles, but never ceasing its mad race
until muscle-power or nerve-force fails because of excessive use and
lack of nourishment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account