has been used hitherto to an insignificant extent: yet it has worked
wonders already. What will not an extraordinary combination of troughs
of colossal magnitude, a well-arranged system of hundreds of metallic
plates, effect?’ Nature, however, like the world, discourages a wild
enthusiasm. ‘His chemical operations seemed to an unskilful observer
to promise nothing but disasters. He had blown himself up at Eton. He
had inadvertently swallowed some mineral poison, which he declared had
seriously injured his health, and from the effects of which he should
never recover. His hands, his clothes, his books, and his furniture,
were stained and covered by medical acids,’ and so on. Disgusted with
these and other failures, he abandoned physics for metaphysics. He rushed
head-long into the form of philosophy then popular. It is not likely
that he ever read Locke; and it is easy to imagine the dismay with which
the philosopher would have regarded so ‘heady and skittish’ a disciple:
but he continually invoked Locke as an authority, and was really guided
by the French expositions of him then popular. Hume, of course, was
not without his influence. With such teachers only to control him, an
excitable poet rushed in a moment to materialism, and thence to atheism.
Deriving any instruction from the University, was, according to him,
absurd; he wished to convert the University. He issued a kind of thesis,
stating by way of interrogatory all the difficulties of the subject;
called it the ‘necessity of atheism,’ and sent it to the professors,
heads of houses, and several bishops. The theistic belief of his college
was equal to the occasion. ‘It was a fine spring morning on Lady Day in
the year 1811, when,’ says a fellow-student, ‘I went to Shelley’s rooms.
He was absent; but before I had collected our books, he rushed in. He
was terribly agitated. I anxiously inquired what had happened. “I am
expelled.” He then explained that he had been summoned before the Master
and some of the Fellows; that as he was unable to deny the authorship of
the essay, he had been expelled and ordered to quit the college the next
morning at latest.’ He had wished to be put on his trial more regularly,
and stated to the Master that England was ‘a free country;’ but without
effect. He was obliged to leave Oxford: his father was very angry; ‘if he
had broken the Master’s windows, one could have understood it:’ but to be
expelled for publishing a _book_ seemed an error incorrigible, because
incomprehensible.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account